10 Cited authorities

Roviaro v. United States
353 U.S. 53 (1957) Cited 4,069 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that the determination of whether an informant's identity must be disclosed requires "balancing the public interest in protecting the flow of information against the individual's right to prepare his defense"
Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Dist. of Mont.
403 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2005) Cited 556 times
Holding "that boilerplate objections or blanket refusals inserted into a response to a Rule 34 request for production of documents are insufficient to assert a privilege"
United States v. Graf
610 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2010) Cited 340 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that "when a Rule 29 motion is made on a specific ground, other grounds not raised are waived"
Pearson v. Miller
211 F.3d 57 (3d Cir. 2000) Cited 388 times
Holding that "[l]egitimate interests in privacy are among the proper subjects of" Rule 26(c)'s protection
State of Cal. v. U.S. Dept. of Commerce
968 F.2d 916 (9th Cir. 1992) Cited 171 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the possible future use of adjusted census data in calculating population estimates between censuses did not render the data "predecisional"
Dellwood Farms, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc.
128 F.3d 1122 (7th Cir. 1997) Cited 130 times
Holding that "[c[ourts are somewhat less likely to find waiver in [a case of inadvertent disclosure]" but that "a privilege can be waived, and, once waived, is lost"
Heath v. Zolotoi
221 F.R.D. 545 (W.D. Wash. 2004) Cited 42 times
David A. Kohles, David A Kohles, Inc. PS, Stanwood, WA, Gregory Norman Bilyeu, Mt. Vernon, WA, for Plaintiff. Dean G. von Kallenbach, Ginger Edwards, John Graeme Young, Shannon D Braden, Karien Lorraine Balluff, Gregory T Pereyra, Matthew Clayton Crane, Bauer, Moynihan & Johnson, Ragan L Powers, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Seattle, WA, for Defendants. ORDER ZILLY, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions, docket no. 95. The Court considered the briefs
In re McKesson Govern. Entities Average Wholesale
264 F.R.D. 595 (N.D. Cal. 2009) Cited 30 times
Holding that, after objections to a subpoena have been served, responding party need only produce documents if ordered by a court on motion
Mendenhall v. Barber-Greene Co.
531 F. Supp. 951 (N.D. Ill. 1982) Cited 74 times
Holding that the better rule is that mere inadvertent production does not waive attorney-client privilege
N.L.R.B. v. SILVER SPUR CASINO
623 F.2d 571 (9th Cir. 1980) Cited 32 times
Summarizing Republic Aviation , 324 U.S. at 803 n.10, 65 S.Ct. 982

Thomas E. Perez v. Seafood Peddler of San Rafael, Inc. et al

10 Cited authorities

Holding that the determination of whether an informant's identity must be disclosed requires "balancing the public interest in protecting the flow of information against the individual's right to prepare his defense"

Holding "that boilerplate objections or blanket refusals inserted into a response to a Rule 34 request for production of documents are insufficient to assert a privilege"

Holding that "when a Rule 29 motion is made on a specific ground, other grounds not raised are waived"

Holding that "[l]egitimate interests in privacy are among the proper subjects of" Rule 26(c)'s protection

Holding that the possible future use of adjusted census data in calculating population estimates between censuses did not render the data "predecisional"

Holding that "[c[ourts are somewhat less likely to find waiver in [a case of inadvertent disclosure]" but that "a privilege can be waived, and, once waived, is lost"

Holding that, after objections to a subpoena have been served, responding party need only produce documents if ordered by a court on motion

Holding that the better rule is that mere inadvertent production does not waive attorney-client privilege

Summarizing Republic Aviation , 324 U.S. at 803 n.10, 65 S.Ct. 982