41 Cited authorities

  1. IDT Corp. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2262 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 861 times
    Holding that unjust enrichment "is an obligation imposed by equity to prevent injustice, in the absence of an actual agreement between the parties concerned. Where the parties executed a valid and enforceable written contract governing a particular subject matter, recovery on a theory of unjust enrichment for events arising out of that subject matter is ordinarily precluded."
  2. Global Financial Corp. v. Triarc Corp.

    93 N.Y.2d 525 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 288 times
    Holding that where the alleged injury was "purely economic," the non-resident corporate Plaintiff's breach of contract claims accrued in the jurisdiction in which it sustained the economic impact of the alleged breach — either the state of incorporation or its principal place of business — rather than New York, thus requiring application of the borrowing statute
  3. Stuart v. American Cyanamid Company

    158 F.3d 622 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 263 times
    Discussing a Nebraska statute of repose forbidding product liability suits brought more than ten years after the product that allegedly caused injury was delivered to the end consumer
  4. Ferraro v. Camarlinghi

    161 Cal.App.4th 509 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 160 times
    Holding section 366.2 did not time-bar action alleging decedent violated agreement for the division of her estate properties and assets
  5. Portfolio Recovery v. King

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 3470 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 146 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, where a claim has been assigned, a court should look to the residence of the assignor to determine the place of accrual for purposes of the borrowing statute
  6. In re Gaston Snow

    243 F.3d 599 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 182 times
    Holding that the forum state's choice-of-law rules apply in the absence of a strong federal interest
  7. Vincent v. Money Store

    915 F. Supp. 2d 553 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)   Cited 57 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the statute of limitations could not be tolled based on the pendency of a prior action in which the defendants were never added as parties
  8. Antone v. General Motors Corp.

    64 N.Y.2d 20 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 121 times
    Holding that a personal injury plaintiff's residency for purposes of CPLR § 202 was determined at the time of the injury
  9. Norex Petroleum Ltd. v. Blavatnik

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4802 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 38 times
    In Norex Petroleum Ltd. v Blavatnik (23 NY3d 665, 678 [2014]), the New York Court of Appeals held that CPLR 205(a) applies, even if a foreign jurisdiction's statute of limitations is "borrowed."
  10. Embree v. Embreee

    125 Cal.App.4th 487 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 28 times
    Finding no evidence of misconduct by the beneficiaries, "or promises on their part that induced [the plaintiff's] forbearance to file suit" so as to preclude assertion of the statute of limitations on equitable estoppel grounds
  11. Section 202 - Cause of action accruing without the state

    N.Y. CPLR 202   Cited 589 times
    Limiting the limitations period for causes of action accruing outside of New York where the foreign jurisdiction imposes a shorter statute of limitations than the state does
  12. Section 366.3 - Action to enforce claim of distribution from decedent's estate or trust

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 366.3   Cited 51 times
    Providing that "the limitations period that would have been applicable does not apply"
  13. Section 9353 - Claim rejected barred unless

    Cal. Prob. Code § 9353   Cited 27 times
    Requiring suit be timely filed after claim rejected
  14. Section 190B:3-803 - Limitations on presentation of claims

    Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 190B § 3-803   Cited 17 times
    Excepting MassHealth from one-year limitation on creditor claims