§Why CasetextPricing

The State of Nevada v. United States Department of The Treasury - Internal Revenue Service

MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Four Years of Rent for the Remainder

8 Cited authorities

  1. Winchell v. Schiff

    124 Nev. 938 (Nev. 2008)   Cited 67 times
    Holding that an appellate court will uphold a jury's determination if the decision is supported by substantial evidence

  2. McClaran v. Plastic Industries

    97 F.3d 347 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 62 times
    Holding that a "jury's award of damages may be stricken where an assumption necessary to support that award is wholly speculative"

  3. Semenza v. Nevada Medical Liability Insurance Co.

    104 Nev. 666 (Nev. 1989)   Cited 60 times
    Affirming the trial court's dismissal without prejudice of a cause of action for attorney malpractice on the grounds that the action was premature, and holding that a cause of action for professional negligence is premature where there has been no final adjudication of the client's case in which the malpractice allegedly occurred, because the element of injury or damage remains speculative and remote

  4. Lee v. Enter. Leasing Company-West, LLC

    30 F. Supp. 3d 1002 (D. Nev. 2014)   Cited 3 times
    Finding "reasonable reading of the statute . . . afforded [d]efendants fair notice that their conduct was at risk"

  5. Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community v. FBCV, LLC

    2:10-CV-10 JCM (RJJ) (D. Nev. Sep. 26, 2011)   Cited 2 times

    2:10-CV-10 JCM (RJJ). September 26, 2011 ORDER JAMES MAHAN, District Judge Presently before the court is plaintiff Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community's ("SMSC") motion for summary judgment for trademark infringement and dismissal of the defendants' counterclaim. (Doc. #61). The defendants FBCV, LLC, Ken Templeton, and Templeton Gaming have responded (doc. #76), and the plaintiff has replied (doc. #79). Also before the court is defendants' motion for summary judgment of declaratory relief. (Doc

  6. Steilacoom Lake Imp. Club Inc. v. Washington State of Department of Natural Resources WA

    138 F. App'x 929 (9th Cir. 2005)

    Argued and Submitted March 10, 2005. NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3) Ralph U. Klose, Esq., Robert Andrew Battles, Esq., Robert I. Goodstein, Esq., Goodstein Law Group, Tacoma, WA, for Plaintiffs--Appellants. Andrew A. Fitz, Esq., Michael James Zevenbergen, Esq., Office of the Attorney General, Ecology Division, Olympia, WA, Daniel R. Hamilton, Esq., Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Civil Division, Tacoma, WA, Tad H. Shimazu, Esq., Williams, Kastner

  7. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 333,232 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  8. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system