16 Cited authorities

Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Dedeaux
481 U.S. 41 (1987) Cited 3,733 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that civil enforcement scheme codified at § 502 is not to be supplemented by state law remedies
California Labor Stds. Enf. v. Dillingham Constr
519 U.S. 316 (1997) Cited 737 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that ERISA did not pre-empt a California statute that incentivized, but did not require, plans to follow certain standards for apprenticeship programs
Pane v. RCA Corp.
868 F.2d 631 (3d Cir. 1989) Cited 245 times
Holding that a plan-participant group comprising less than one-tenth of one percent of the workforce was numerically select
Lass v. Bank of Am., N.A.
695 F.3d 129 (1st Cir. 2012) Cited 119 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a plaintiff may "plead alternative and even inconsistent legal theories, such as breach of contract and unjust enrichment, even if Plaintiffs only can recover under one of these theories"
Patco Constr. Co. v. People's United Bank
684 F.3d 197 (1st Cir. 2012) Cited 66 times 9 Legal Analyses
Granting summary judgment in favor of defendant bank on negligence claim, finding it inconsistent with Section 4–A–202 even while holding that the agreed-upon security procedure was commercially unreasonable
Medisim Ltd. v. Bestmed LLC
910 F. Supp. 2d 591 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) Cited 40 times
Ruling on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment
Pane v. RCA Corp.
667 F. Supp. 168 (D.N.J. 1987) Cited 57 times
Finding claim that employer violated agreement to provide employee with severance agreement was preempted, regardless of whether employee was actually covered by severance agreement
Coleman v. Standard Life Ins. Co.
288 F. Supp. 2d 1116 (E.D. Cal. 2003) Cited 22 times 1 Legal Analyses
Denying motion to dismiss state claims before determining whether ERISA applied
Nelson v. HNTB Corporation
No. 05CV422 (MRK) (D. Conn. Aug. 8, 2006) Cited 11 times
Holding that the sworn affidavits of parties asserting joint authorship along with one of those two individual's names listed on the certificate of registration raised a genuine issue of material fact sufficient to preclude summary judgment under intent requirement of joint authorship
In re Crazy Eddie Securities Litigation
747 F. Supp. 850 (E.D.N.Y. 1990) Cited 28 times
Declining to extend American Pipe tolling to a “placeholder suit” where the original plaintiff lacked standing
Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading
Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 Cited 162,084 times 197 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

The Retirees of the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company Health Care Trust Committee v. State Street Corporation et al

16 Cited authorities

Holding that civil enforcement scheme codified at § 502 is not to be supplemented by state law remedies

Holding that ERISA did not pre-empt a California statute that incentivized, but did not require, plans to follow certain standards for apprenticeship programs

Holding that a plan-participant group comprising less than one-tenth of one percent of the workforce was numerically select

Holding that a plaintiff may "plead alternative and even inconsistent legal theories, such as breach of contract and unjust enrichment, even if Plaintiffs only can recover under one of these theories"

Granting summary judgment in favor of defendant bank on negligence claim, finding it inconsistent with Section 4–A–202 even while holding that the agreed-upon security procedure was commercially unreasonable

Ruling on the parties' cross motions for summary judgment

Finding claim that employer violated agreement to provide employee with severance agreement was preempted, regardless of whether employee was actually covered by severance agreement

Denying motion to dismiss state claims before determining whether ERISA applied

Holding that the sworn affidavits of parties asserting joint authorship along with one of those two individual's names listed on the certificate of registration raised a genuine issue of material fact sufficient to preclude summary judgment under intent requirement of joint authorship

Declining to extend American Pipe tolling to a “placeholder suit” where the original plaintiff lacked standing

Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."