31 Cited authorities

  1. Galbraith Engineering Consul v. Pochucha

    290 S.W.3d 863 (Tex. 2009)   Cited 293 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that section 33.004(e) revives claims "otherwise 'barred by limitations' under certain limited circumstances"
  2. F.F.P. Operating v. Duenez

    237 S.W.3d 680 (Tex. 2007)   Cited 297 times
    Holding chapter 33 applied to the Texas Dram Shop Act in part based on the fact the act was not explicitly excepted from coverage as other acts are
  3. Chu v. Chong Hui Hong

    249 S.W.3d 441 (Tex. 2008)   Cited 134 times
    Holding that a third party cannot be held liable in tort when community property is taken by one of the spouses, citing Cohrs v. Scott , 161 Tex. 111, 338 S.W.2d 127, 133
  4. Fisher v. Halliburton

    667 F.3d 602 (5th Cir. 2012)   Cited 101 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that "the applicability of the LHWCA’s exclusivity provision presents ... an issue of preemption, not jurisdiction" and that "Federal preemption is an affirmative defense that a defendant must plead and prove"
  5. Schlumberger Well Surveying v. Nortex Oil Gas

    435 S.W.2d 854 (Tex. 1969)   Cited 293 times
    Holding that civil conspiracy consists of a combination of two or more persons or entities
  6. JCW Electronics, Inc. v. Garza

    257 S.W.3d 701 (Tex. 2008)   Cited 82 times
    Holding negligence, products-liability, and breach-of-warranty causes of action subject to chapter 33
  7. Dugger v. Arredondo

    56 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1099 (Tex. 2013)   Cited 65 times
    Concluding state statutory proportionality scheme "controls over the unlawful acts doctrine" because "the statute indicates the Legislature's desire to compare responsibility for injuries rather than bar recovery, even if the claimant was partly at fault or violated some legal standard"
  8. In re Unitec Elevator Services

    178 S.W.3d 53 (Tex. App. 2005)   Cited 69 times
    Finding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners late-filed motion to designate where "relators waited over 18 months after plaintiffs named Centerpoint as a defendant to seek leave to designate Centerpoint as a responsible third party, and relators knew that plaintiffs could non-suit their claims at any time"
  9. Sterling Trust Co. v. Adderley

    168 S.W.3d 835 (Tex. 2005)   Cited 59 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Texas Security Act is to be "construed ... to effectuate its general purpose to maximize coordination with federal and other states' law and administration."
  10. Carroll v. Timmers Chevrolet, Inc.

    592 S.W.2d 922 (Tex. 1980)   Cited 126 times
    Holding a co-conspirator jointly and severally liable for all acts done in furtherance of the conspiracy
  11. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,110 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Providing for service via CM/ECF Systems
  12. Section 33.003 - Determination of Percentage of Responsibility

    Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.003   Cited 263 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Determining percentage of responsibility
  13. Section 33.002 - Applicability

    Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.002   Cited 183 times
    Applying only to a "cause of action based on tort in which a defendant, settling person, or responsible third party is found responsible for a percentage of the harm for which relief is sought" or an action brought under the DTPA "in which a defendant, settling person, or responsible third party is found responsible for a percentage of the harm for which relief is sought"
  14. Section 581-33 - [Repealed]

    Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. art. 581-33   Cited 147 times
    Providing "[n]o person may sue" under the TSA "more than five years after the sale" of the securities at issue
  15. Section 33.013 - Amount of Liability

    Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.013   Cited 76 times
    Providing that when percentage of causation attributable to defendant is greater than 50%, defendant is jointly and severally liable for all compensatory damages