69 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 266,896 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 279,933 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 29,228 times   144 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
  4. Pinter v. Dahl

    486 U.S. 622 (1988)   Cited 877 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that only a statutory "seller" may be liable under § 12 of Securities Act
  5. Norris v. Hearst Trust

    500 F.3d 454 (5th Cir. 2007)   Cited 992 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiffs lacked standing because they were "neither consumers nor competitors in the market attempted to be constrained"
  6. Tuchman v. DSC Commc'ns Corp.

    14 F.3d 1061 (5th Cir. 1994)   Cited 1,158 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that motive to inflate stock price and value of defendants investments was insufficient to establish scienter under Rule 9(b)
  7. IHS Cedars Treatment Center of DeSoto, Texas, Inc. v. Mason

    143 S.W.3d 794 (Tex. 2004)   Cited 681 times
    Holding the act of discharging a patient merely created the condition for that patient to get into a car accident and, therefore, was not the proximate cause as a matter of law
  8. Ernst Young v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance

    51 S.W.3d 573 (Tex. 2001)   Cited 692 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that aiding and abetting liability could not attach where there was no principal offense
  9. Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Technologies

    302 F.3d 552 (5th Cir. 2002)   Cited 520 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim under Article 581-33A for an un-true promise of future performance requires proof that the defendant had no intention of performing the promise at the time it was made
  10. Warfield v. Byron

    436 F.3d 551 (5th Cir. 2006)   Cited 454 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that referral services for a Ponzi scheme provided no value to the scheme as a matter of law
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 361,619 times   960 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 163,952 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 40,136 times   335 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that fraud be pleaded with particularity
  14. Rule 19 - Required Joinder of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 19   Cited 9,796 times   55 Legal Analyses
    Holding a person must be joined if disposing the action in the person's absence may leave an existing party subject to a "substantial" risk of incurring inconsistent obligations
  15. Section 24.005 - Transfers Fraudulent As to Present and Future Creditors

    Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 24.005   Cited 474 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a transferor to act with “actual intent to . . . defraud,” but saying nothing about the transferee's state of mind
  16. Section 24.006 - Transfers Fraudulent As to Present Creditors

    Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 24.006   Cited 165 times   3 Legal Analyses

    (a) A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor whose claim arose before the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred if the debtor made the transfer or incurred the obligation without receiving a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer or obligation and the debtor was insolvent at that time or the debtor became insolvent as a result of the transfer or obligation. (b) A transfer made by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor whose claim

  17. Section 24.008 - Remedies of Creditors

    Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 24.008   Cited 141 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Allowing a prevailing claimant to avoid the challenged transfer or attach the asset transferred or property of the transferee
  18. Section 24.009 - Defenses, Liability, and Protection of Transferee

    Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 24.009   Cited 135 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing that creditors may recover "the value of the asset transferred," which "must be for an amount equal to the value of the asset at the time of the transfer, subject to adjustment as the equities may require"
  19. Section 24.010 - Extinguishment of Cause of Action

    Tex. Bus. & Com. Code § 24.010   Cited 103 times
    Providing a four-year look back period for actual and constructively fraudulent transfers