§Why CasetextPricing

The Official Stanford Investors Committee et al v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP et al

Brief/Memorandum in Support

44 Cited authorities

  1. Tellabs v. Makor Issues Rights

    551 U.S. 308 (2007)   Cited 9,448 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a strong inference is one that is "cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference"

  2. Hunter v. Bryant

    502 U.S. 224 (1991)   Cited 4,975 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that probable cause is assessed in relation to the facts possessed by the arresting officer at the time he made the warrantless arrest

  3. Basic Inc. v. Levinson

    485 U.S. 224 (1988)   Cited 3,401 times   312 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the District Court appropriately certified the class based on the presumption of reliance

  4. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.

    467 U.S. 752 (1984)   Cited 1,453 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a parent and a wholly owned subsidiary have a "complete unity of interest" because "their objectives are common" and "their general corporate actions are guided or determined not by two separate corporate consciousness, but one"

  5. Daniels-Hall v. National Educ. Ass'n

    629 F.3d 992 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 2,173 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding information made publicly available on official government websites appropriate for judicial notice

  6. Herman MacLean v. Huddleston

    459 U.S. 375 (1983)   Cited 1,320 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an express remedy under § 11 of the 1933 Act for misleading registration statements did not preclude an overlapping implied private cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation under § 10(b) of the 1934 Act

  7. Baker v. Putnal

    75 F.3d 190 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 2,601 times
    Holding that disputed issues of fact precluded summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds where officer asserted that victim "was holding a semi-automatic pistol, loaded the pistol with ammunition, and leveled it at him from the passenger's side of the vehicle," but three witnesses testified that victim "took no threatening action toward" the officer, and officer and witnesses’ accounts conflicted whether the officer had issued any orders to the victim before shooting and disputed whether the victim "was even holding the pistol or pointing it at" the officer

  8. Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. Berner

    472 U.S. 299 (1985)   Cited 369 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in pari delicto would not prevent defrauded tippee from bringing suit against defrauding tipper, at least absent further inquiry into “relative culpabilities” of tippee and tipper

  9. Perma Mufflers v. Int'l Parts Corp.

    392 U.S. 134 (1968)   Cited 513 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that doctrine of in pari delicto is not a defense to an antitrust suit

  10. Rusk State Hosp. v. Black

    55 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1320 (Tex. 2012)   Cited 424 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "use" does not include "providing, furnishing, or allowing access to tangible property"

  11. Section 2 - Principals

    18 U.S.C. § 2   Cited 24,286 times   58 Legal Analyses
    Holding aiders and abettors punishable as principals under federal criminal law

  12. Section 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States

    18 U.S.C. § 371   Cited 21,828 times   143 Legal Analyses
    Requiring proof of an "act to effect the object of the conspiracy"

  13. Section 1341 - Frauds and swindles

    18 U.S.C. § 1341   Cited 13,619 times   104 Legal Analyses
    Relating to mail fraud

  14. Section 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television

    18 U.S.C. § 1343   Cited 12,414 times   173 Legal Analyses
    Barring fraudulent schemes "for obtaining money or property"

  15. Section 581-4 - [Repealed]

    Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. art. 581-4   Cited 44 times
    Providing that the term security "shall not apply to any . . . annuity contract . . . or any contract or agreement in relation to and in consequence of any such policy or contract"

  16. Section 581-29 - [Repealed]

    Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. art. 581-29   Cited 24 times
    Providing penal provisions for violations of the Texas Securities Act