§Why CasetextPricing

The Nick Vertucci Companies, Inc., et al. v. Parr

Response in Opposition to Motion

5 Cited authorities

  1. Days Inn Worldwide, Inc. v. Sonia Invs.

    237 F.R.D. 395 (N.D. Tex. 2006)   Cited 105 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that motion to compel must be filed before close of discovery

  2. Integra Lifesciences I, Ltd. v. Merck KGaA

    190 F.R.D. 556 (S.D. Cal. 1999)   Cited 99 times
    Finding no distinction between a discovery deposition and trial deposition

  3. Dixon v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-179-JWD-RLB (M.D. La. Nov. 19, 2014)   Cited 12 times
    Finding nine-day response time unreasonable

  4. Curry v. Strain

    262 F. App'x 650 (5th Cir. 2008)   Cited 13 times
    Finding no abuse of discretion where the district court dismissed a motion to compel in part because it was filed almost one month after the discovery deadline

  5. Rule 45 - Subpoena

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 45   Cited 16,498 times   104 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"