§Why CasetextPricing

The John K. Maciver Institute For Public Policy, Inc. v. Schmitz, Francis et al

Brief in Opposition

34 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 262,920 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 276,185 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

  3. Jane Doe v. Vill. of Arlington Heights

    782 F.3d 911 (7th Cir. 2015)   Cited 202 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding police officer did not violate Due Process by failing to prevent rape despite seeing men carrying unconscious girl and failing to intervene

  4. Neita v. City of Chi.

    830 F.3d 494 (7th Cir. 2016)   Cited 145 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that officers were not entitled to qualified immunity at the pleadings stage when the plaintiff "alleged that the officers never received a complaint of animal abuse or neglect, or alternatively, that they knew that any such complaint was false"

  5. Graf v. Zynga Game Network, Inc. (In re Zynga Privacy Litig.)

    750 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 55 times
    Holding "referer header information ... transmitted to third parties .... does not meet the definition of ‘contents,’ because these pieces of information are not the ‘substance, purport, or meaning’ of a communication"

  6. In Matter of John Doe Proceeding

    2003 WI 30 (Wis. 2003)   Cited 25 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Explaining the limits on the John Doe judge's power

  7. State v. Doe

    78 Wis. 2d 161 (Wis. 1977)   Cited 66 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that the state has on occasion accorded criminal defendants broader right to counsel than mandated by the United States Supreme Court under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

  8. State v. Washington

    83 Wis. 2d 808 (Wis. 1978)   Cited 61 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Describing the statutory history

  9. United States v. Orisakwe

    624 F. App'x 149 (5th Cir. 2015)   Cited 5 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 14-40699 08-05-2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee v. DAMIAN ORISAKWE, Defendant - Appellant PER CURIAM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-265 Before REAVLEY, PRADO, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. A jury convicted Damian Orisakwe

  10. State v. West

    214 Wis. 2d 468 (Wis. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 20 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Observing that " Harrell . . . only applies when the reasonably related charge is `more serious'" than the plea crime and declining to apply Harrell when the reasonably related crime has the same maximum penalty as the plea crime

  11. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 161,761 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

  12. Section 2511 - Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited

    18 U.S.C. § 2511   Cited 2,831 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Imposing a penalty on persons who “intentionally intercept ... any wire, oral, or electronic communication”

  13. Section 2703 - Required disclosure of customer communications or records

    18 U.S.C. § 2703   Cited 1,232 times   100 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that these providers "shall disclose" such information "when the governmental entity uses an administrative subpoena authorized by a Federal or State statute"

  14. Section 2707 - Civil action

    18 U.S.C. § 2707   Cited 463 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Granting relief to those "aggrieved by any violation of this chapter in which the conduct constituting the violation is engaged in with a knowing or intentional state of mind"

  15. Section 2711 - Definitions for chapter

    18 U.S.C. § 2711   Cited 192 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Adopting terms defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2510

  16. Section 968.26 - John Doe proceeding

    Wis. Stat. § 968.26   Cited 53 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to subpoena witnesses and take testimony

  17. Section 968.12 - Search warrant

    Wis. Stat. § 968.12   Cited 36 times
    Defining a search warrant as "an order signed by a judge"

  18. Section 809.51 - Rule (Supervisory writ and original jurisdiction to issue prerogative writ)

    Wis. Stat. § 809.51   Cited 23 times   3 Legal Analyses

    (1) A person may request the court to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction or its original jurisdiction to issue a prerogative writ over a court and the presiding judge, or other person or body, by filing a petition and supporting memorandum. The petition shall be served on each party and proposed respondent, and, if applicable, upon the originating court or tribunal, by traditional methods as provided in s. 809.80(2). The petition and memorandum combined may not exceed 35 pages if a monospaced

  19. Section 967.02 - Words and phrases defined

    Wis. Stat. § 967.02   Cited 14 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining "court" as "the circuit court unless otherwise indicated"

  20. Section 972.08 - Incriminating testimony compelled; immunity

    Wis. Stat. § 972.08   Cited 12 times
    Indicating person may be compelled to testify "by order of the court"