18 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 216,309 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  2. Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins

    304 U.S. 64 (1938)   Cited 20,388 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that state law governs substantive issues and federal law governs procedural issues
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. v. Gillette

    2002 WI 31 (Wis. 2002)   Cited 139 times
    Holding that to determine the amount of damages a Wisconsin insured was legally entitled to recover for an accident in Manitoba, the court "must apply all of Wisconsin law, including Wisconsin tort choice of law rules"
  4. Coffey v. Milwaukee

    74 Wis. 2d 526 (Wis. 1976)   Cited 213 times
    Holding that "[a]ny duty owed to the public generally is a duty owed to individual members of the public" and being guided by public policy considerations when considering whether liability should be imposed for torts
  5. Chang v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.

    599 F.3d 728 (7th Cir. 2010)   Cited 80 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding forum-non-conveniens dismissal was inappropriate because the claim would be barred by a statute of limitations
  6. Dippel v. Sciano

    37 Wis. 2d 443 (Wis. 1967)   Cited 253 times
    Adopting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A
  7. Sumnicht v. Toyota Motor Sales

    121 Wis. 2d 338 (Wis. 1984)   Cited 97 times
    Concluding that a car seat was defectively designed because it was not padded with energy-absorbing material
  8. Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hosp

    99 Wis. 2d 708 (Wis. 1981)   Cited 105 times
    Holding that "since the procedures ordinarily employed by hospitals in evaluating applications for staff privileges are not within the realm of the ordinary experience of mankind, we agree ... that expert testimony was required to prove the same"
  9. Merco Distributing Corp. v. Commercial Police Alarm Co.

    84 Wis. 2d 455 (Wis. 1978)   Cited 100 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Analyzing the causation element of common law negligence
  10. Zielinski v. A.P. Green Industries

    2003 WI App. 85 (Wis. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 32 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Zielinski, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that the plaintiffs presented enough evidence to create a genuine dispute of fact as to whether the decedent was exposed to the defendant's asbestos products.
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,736 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 111,364 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"
  13. Section 895.043 - Punitive damages

    Wis. Stat. § 895.043   Cited 97 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Considering wealth of a defendant in setting punitive damages award