A96A1738. DECIDED FEBRUARY 14, 1997. Action on contract. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Westmoreland. Schreeder, Wheeler Flint, Steven G. Hill, James C. Morton, for appellant. Morris, Manning Martin, Lewis E. Hassett, Hassett, Cohen, Beitchman Goldstein, Robert W. Hassett, for appellee. SMITH, Judge. Jack Rich brought suit against King Industrial Realty, Inc., an industrial real estate brokerage firm where he worked as an agent until his termination in 1989. Rich's complaint alleged breach of his
A98A0928. NOVEMBER 30, 1998. RECONSIDERATION DENIED DECEMBER 15, 1998. Action on contract, etc. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Wright. Alembeck, Fine Callner, Mark E. Bergeson, Zoe I. Martinez, for appellants. Troutman Sanders, Kaye W. Burwell, John J. Dalton, for appellee. RUFFIN, Judge. Pacrim Associates and one of its shareholders and employees, Pamela Kent, sued Turner Home Entertainment ("Turner") under various contract theories and for fraud. In its complaint, Pacrim alleges that it entered
No. A10A1395. DECIDED NOVEMBER 30, 2010. Real estate sales contract. Cobb Superior Court. Before Judge Flournoy. Richard S. Alembik, Willis L. Miller IV, for appellants. Bentley, Bentley Bentley, Fred D. Bentley, Sr., for appellees. ADAMS, Judge. George W. Lumsden and Helen F. Lumsden filed this appeal after the trial court granted summary judgment to Stephen P. Williams and Elizabeth McGee (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Sellers") on the Lumsdens' claims arising from alleged construction
1:08-cv-1686-WSD 04-15-2015 VICKI CRISWELL, Plaintiff, v. INTELLIRISK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, INC. and ALLIED INTERSTATE, INC., Defendant. WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Intellirisk Management Corporation, Inc.'s and Allied Interstate, Inc.'s ("Defendants") Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law [112] (the "Motion"). I. BACKGROUND This is a civil case for breach of contract. Plaintiff Vicki Criswell ("Plaintiff") claims that
A00A1944. DECIDED: MARCH 15, 2001. Accord and satisfaction. Gwinnett Superior Court. Before Judge Jackson. Stanley E. Kreimer, Jr., for appellant. McGee Oxford, James J. Brissette, for appellee. PHIPPS, Judge. Richard Withington was a salesman and independent contractor for the Valuation Group, Inc. (VGI), a tax consulting firm, from 1992 to 1998. He sued VGI in 1998, claiming that it had underpaid his commissions and breached his contract by terminating it without prior notice, among other things
70009. DECIDED MAY 3, 1985. Action on contract. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Langford. A. E. Daniel III, for appellant. John R. Lowery, for appellee. CARLEY, Judge. In 1965, appellant-plaintiff became a distributor of appellee-defendant's products. There was never a written agreement between the parties. The oral agreement was only that the relationship would continue for an indefinite period. In February of 1983, appellee informed appellant that the relationship would be terminated and, several
A96A0878. DECIDED AUGUST 6, 1996. Action on employment contract. Sumter State Court. Before Judge Fennessy. Ellis, Easterlin, Peagler, Gatewood, Harper Skipper, John V. Harper, for appellants. Vansant, Corriere, McClure Dasher, Alfred N. Corriere, for appellee. Judge Harold R. Banke. Andrew Bowen sued his former employer, Danfair Properties, Inc. ("Danfair"), and its president, Reginald Daniel, for $59,961.28 in commissions Bowen allegedly earned during the three years he assisted Danfair in developing
(a) Except as otherwise provided in this Code section, an agreement by a creditor to receive less than the amount of his debt cannot be pleaded as an accord and satisfaction unless it is actually executed by the payment of the money, the giving of additional security, the substitution of another debtor, or some other new consideration. (b) Acceptance by a creditor of a check, draft, or money order marked "payment in full" or with language of equivalent condition, in an amount less than the total
An accord and satisfaction must be of some advantage, legal or equitable, to the creditor or it shall not have the effect of barring him from his legal rights under the original agreement. OCGA § 13-4-102