§Why CasetextPricing

"The Apple iPod iTunes Anti-Trust Litigation"

MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings As To Plaintiffs' Tying Claims

43 Cited authorities

  1. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.

    504 U.S. 451 (1992)   Cited 2,287 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "it is clearly reasonable to infer that [the defendant] has market power to raise prices and drive out competition in the aftermarkets" for service and parts despite an undisputed lack of market power in the initial product

  2. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.

    467 U.S. 752 (1984)   Cited 1,434 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a parent and a wholly owned subsidiary have a "complete unity of interest" because "their objectives are common" and "their general corporate actions are guided or determined not by two separate corporate consciousness, but one"

  3. Verizon Comm. v. Law Offices of Trinko

    540 U.S. 398 (2004)   Cited 506 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Holding even a monopolist has no duty to cooperate with rivals

  4. Jefferson Parish Hospital Dist. No. 2 v. Hyde

    466 U.S. 2 (1984)   Cited 802 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "any inquiry into the validity of a tying arrangement must focus on the market or markets in which the two products are sold, for that is where the anticompetitive forcing has its impact"

  5. Northern Pac. R. Co. v. United States

    356 U.S. 1 (1958)   Cited 1,394 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Finding market power based on the uniqueness of the owned land

  6. Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.

    547 U.S. 28 (2006)   Cited 231 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that separate markets existed for software and hardware even when they were always bundled together

  7. County of Tuolumne v. Sonora Community Hosp

    236 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 647 times
    Holding that the Cartwright Act was "modeled after the Sherman Act" and so the analysis "mirrors the analysis under federal law"

  8. Paladin Associates, Inc. v. Montana Power Co.

    328 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 369 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the appellant's failure to develop any challenge to a conclusion by the district court waives the issue

  9. International Salt Co. v. U.S.

    332 U.S. 392 (1947)   Cited 535 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting International Salt's claim that it had to control the supply of salt to protect its leased machines in the absence of proof that competitors could not supply salt of equal quality

  10. Standard Oil Co. v. United States

    337 U.S. 293 (1949)   Cited 396 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Clayton Act § 3 was violated whenever the exclusive dealing arrangement foreclosed a significant dollar volume of commerce

  11. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 17,824 times   315 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices

  12. Section 1 - Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty

    15 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 2,898 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Making illegal "[e]very contract, combination ..., or conspiracy, in restraint of trade"

  13. Section 1750 - Title of act

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1750   Cited 2,670 times   67 Legal Analyses

    This title may be cited as the Consumers Legal Remedies Act. Ca. Civ. Code § 1750 Added by Stats. 1970, Ch. 1550.

  14. Section 16720 - Trust

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16720   Cited 423 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting any combination to prevent competition in the "sale or purchase of any commodity"

  15. Section 16700 - Cumulative provisions

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 16700   Cited 365 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Banning agreements to restrain trade