Holding that public employee discharged by official in charge of hiring and firing did not state a claim for tortious interference with economic advantage
Holding "in the corporate world, officers enjoy immunity from these types of claims provided that they work the action in pursuit of the legitimate interests of the company."
Affirming dismissal of complaint for failure to state a cause of action for tortious interference with contract because no resulting breach was alleged
258 Ill. App. 3d 814 (Ill. App. Ct. 1994) Cited 34 times
Rejecting tortious interference with prospective contractual relationship claim where plaintiff charged that president of defendant college “made a statement allegedly threatening to her future employability,” as the president was an agent of her employer and thus she was claiming interference by the defendant and not by a third party
78 F. Supp. 2d 783 (N.D. Ill. 1999) Cited 17 times
Holding that the defendant's statements that the plaintiff had "poor interpersonal skills and run-of-the-mill professional abilities" were "nonactionable statements of subjective opinion"