Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz

Holding that a defendant has "fair warning" if he purposefully directs his activities at residents of the forum and if the litigation results from alleged injuries arising out of or relating to those activities.

Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington

Holding that states may exercise personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants with "certain minimum contacts with [the forum] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice’ " (quoting Milliken v. Meyer , 311 U.S. 457, 463, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 278 (1940) )

Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLC

Holding that a defendant's conduct was purposefully directed toward New York because the defendant offered bags for sale on its website to New York customers and shipped at least one bag to a New York customer

Licci ex rel. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank SAL

Finding New York law applied to tort claim where all of the challenged conduct occurred in New York even though the plaintiffs' injuries occurred in Israel, where they were domiciled

Johnston v. Multidata

Holding defendant did not "ha[ve] a general business presence in [Texas] based on the residence of two employees . . . [who] work[ed] from home and report[ed] to supervisors located in Toronto, Canada" because "[w]hile their presence [was] certainly a regular contact with Texas, it [was] not substantial enough to create a general business presence in Texas"

Penguin Group

Holding that use of the internet affects situs of injury inquiry because of the "speed and ease with which the internet may allow out of state actions to cause injury"

Bank Brussels v. Fiddler Gonzalez Rodriguez

Holding that the plaintiff must establish all five elements in order to assert jurisdiction pursuant to section 3O2

Jazini ex rel. Jazini v. Nissan Motor Co.

Holding that "conclusory non-fact-specific jurisdictional allegations" and "legal conclusion couched as a factual allegation" do not meet the burden of a prima facie showing of jurisdiction

Daniel v. Am. Bd. of Emergency Med.

Holding that plaintiffs failed to demonstrate antitrust injury where their "economic expert conceded that he had performed no analysis of the consumer effect of defendants’ purportedly anticompetitive conduct"

Sunward Elecs., Inc. v. McDonald

Holding that Defendants transacted business in New York where they "maintained a continuous and on-going commercial relationship with Plaintiff, a New York business," and "traveled to New York on two occasions to attend . . . training programs"

Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Rule 4 - Summons

Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

Section 302 - Personal jurisdiction by acts of non-domiciliaries

Holding that service may be made "to a person of suitable age and discretion at the actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode of the person to be served and by ... mailing the summons to the person to be served at his or her last known residence"

Section 301 - Jurisdiction over persons, property or status

Codifying caselaw that incorporates "doing business" standard

Section 22 - District in which to sue corporation

Providing for venue where the defendant is "an inhabitant," "may be found," or "transacts business"

Section 301 - License for radio communication or transmission of energy

Stating the purpose of the FCA, "to provide for the use of [radio] channels, but not the ownership thereof"

Section 22.3 - Reserved