§Why CasetextPricing

Texas IP Research, LLC v. Pentair, Inc. et al

MOTION to Dismiss

26 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 267,813 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 280,791 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

  3. Associated General Contractors v. Carpenters

    459 U.S. 519 (1983)   Cited 5,250 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union lacked standing to sue for injuries passed on to it by intermediaries

  4. Buckley v. Valeo

    424 U.S. 1 (1976)   Cited 3,471 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public financing law does not "abridge, restrict, or censor" expression

  5. Printz v. United States

    521 U.S. 898 (1997)   Cited 776 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional a statute obligating state law enforcement officers to implement a federal gun-control law

  6. Nixon v. Administrator of General Services

    433 U.S. 425 (1977)   Cited 1,107 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act was not an unconstitutional bill of attainder because former President Nixon "constituted a legitimate class of one"

  7. Morrison v. Olson

    487 U.S. 654 (1988)   Cited 597 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding an independent counsel to be an inferior officer

  8. Exergen Corporation v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    575 F.3d 1312 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 699 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegation that "Exergen, its agents and/or attorneys . . . knew of the material information and deliberately withheld or misrepresented it" without naming "the specific individual associated with the filing or prosecution of the application" was not sufficiently particular to satisfy the "who" element of an inequitable conduct claim

  9. Johnson v. Rowley

    569 F.3d 40 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 457 times
    Holding that a federal inmate "had to comply with the BOP's . . . administrative grievance system for prisoner complaints"

  10. Clontech Laboratories v. Invitrogen Corp.

    406 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2005)   Cited 130 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must show that a defendant "did not have an honest good faith belief in marking its products"

  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 362,607 times   962 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 164,455 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

  13. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 40,207 times   337 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that fraud be pleaded with particularity

  14. Section 3730 - Civil actions for false claims

    31 U.S.C. § 3730   Cited 5,600 times   454 Legal Analyses
    Granting the relator up to 30% of any government recovery

  15. Section 292 - False marking

    35 U.S.C. § 292   Cited 574 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Providing cause of action and share of recovery against a person falsely marking patented articles

  16. Section 3 - Legislative, Diplomatic, and Law Enforcement Duties of the President

    U.S. Const. art. II, § 3   Cited 446 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to the President to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed"