§Why CasetextPricing

Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. United States of America et al

RESPONSE

37 Cited authorities

  1. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

    555 U.S. 7 (2008)   Cited 16,934 times   68 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"

  2. Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA

    568 U.S. 398 (2013)   Cited 3,117 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding that respondents could not establish injury by relying on a "speculative chain of possibilities"

  3. Gonzaga University v. Doe

    536 U.S. 273 (2002)   Cited 3,264 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that nothing "short of an unambiguously conferred right ... support a cause of action brought under § 1983"

  4. Alexander v. Sandoval

    532 U.S. 275 (2001)   Cited 2,655 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it is "beyond dispute" that banning discrimination " ‘on the ground of race’ " "prohibits only intentional discrimination"

  5. Cannon v. University of Chicago

    441 U.S. 677 (1979)   Cited 2,361 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 created a private right of action for victims of education discrimination

  6. Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo

    456 U.S. 305 (1982)   Cited 1,776 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Federal Water Pollution Control Act did not mandate injunctions against its violation

  7. Mathews v. Diaz

    426 U.S. 67 (1976)   Cited 974 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that congressional alienage-based restrictions on federal Medicare benefits did not violate due process

  8. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Co.

    339 U.S. 667 (1950)   Cited 1,875 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding Congress enlarged the range of available federal court remedies, not jurisdiction, under the DJA because "[i]t is well-settled that the [DJA] cannot serve as an independent basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction"

  9. Universities Research Assn. v. Coutu

    450 U.S. 754 (1981)   Cited 309 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the DBA “does not confer a private right of action for back wages under a contract that administratively has been determined not to call for Davis–Bacon work,” but declining to decide “whether the Act creates an implied private right of action to enforce a contract that contains specific [DBA] stipulations”

  10. Okpalobi v. Foster

    244 F.3d 405 (5th Cir. 2001)   Cited 361 times
    Holding that Young applies where "the defendant state official . . . at least [has] the ability to act"

  11. Section 2201 - Creation of remedy

    28 U.S.C. § 2201   Cited 24,642 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts the authority to create a remedy with the force of a final judgment

  12. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 22,605 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice

  13. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,426 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  14. Section 1182 - Inadmissible aliens

    8 U.S.C. § 1182   Cited 9,767 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding deportable aliens who have been convicted of "crimes involving moral turpitude"

  15. Section 1157 - Annual admission of refugees and admission of emergency situation refugees

    8 U.S.C. § 1157   Cited 182 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Imposing certain population caps for resettling refugees

  16. Section 1522 - Authorization for programs for domestic resettlement of and assistance to refugees

    8 U.S.C. § 1522   Cited 37 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Requiring nonprofit agencies to notify local welfare offices of refugees' employment offers and provide documentation regarding receipt of cash assistance and other services

  17. Section 1521 - Office of Refugee Resettlement; establishment; appointment of Director; functions

    8 U.S.C. § 1521   Cited 31 times

    (a) There is established, within the Department of Health and Human Services, an office to be known as the Office of Refugee Resettlement (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Office"). The head of the Office shall be a Director (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Director"), to be appointed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Secretary"). (b) The function of the Office and its Director is to fund and administer

  18. Section 400.4 - Purpose of the plan

    45 C.F.R. § 400.4   Cited 2 times

    (a) In order for a State to receive refugee resettlement assistance from funds appropriated under section 414 of the Act, it must submit to ORR a plan that meets the requirements of title IV of the Act and of this part and that is approved under § 400.8 of this part. (b) A State must certify no later than 30 days after the beginning of each Federal fiscal year that the approved State plan is current and continues in effect. If a State wishes to change its plan, a State must submit a proposed amendment