511 U.S. 375 (1994) Cited 19,218 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that absent a reservation of jurisdiction in the stipulated dismissal order, federal courts lack jurisdiction to consider enforcement of a settlement agreement
522 U.S. 156 (1997) Cited 4,846 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that § 1367 "applies with equal force to cases removed to federal court as to cases initially filed there; a removed case is necessarily one 'of which the district courts . . . have original jurisdiction.'"
Holding that district court's dismissal of state law claims just seven days before trial and after long delays was neither fair to parties nor efficient use of judicial resources, and hence abuse of discretion
Vacating the United States District Court for the District of Alaska's grant of summary judgment and remanding the case with an order to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
28 U.S.C. § 1367 Cited 62,284 times 78 Legal Analyses
Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"
Ca. Health and Saf. Code § 25316 Repealed by Stats 2022 ch 257 (AB 2293),s 1, eff. 1/1/2023, op. 1/1/2024. Repealed and added by Stats. 1999, Ch. 23, Sec. 2. Effective May 26, 1999.