20 Cited authorities

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009) Cited 252,784 times 279 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie
452 U.S. 394 (1981) Cited 2,908 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that considerations of fairness and equity do not vitiate the res judicata effect of a previous, unappealed judgment, even if that judgment "rest on a legal principle subsequently overruled in another case"
Harris v. Cnty. of Orange
682 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2012) Cited 1,179 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the court "may take judicial notice of undisputed matters of public record . . . including documents on file in federal or state courts"
Ackermann v. United States
340 U.S. 193 (1950) Cited 1,586 times
Holding that petitioners were not entitled to relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) when they made a "free, calculated, deliberate choic[e]" not to appeal
Dworkin v. Hustler Magazine Inc.
867 F.2d 1188 (9th Cir. 1989) Cited 727 times
Holding that Rule 12(c) and Rule 12(b) motions differ in time of filing but are otherwise "functionally identical," and applying the same standard of review
Heliotrope General, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
189 F.3d 971 (9th Cir. 1999) Cited 359 times
Holding where allegedly omitted information was part of the "total mix of information" available, plaintiff could not state a claim under § 10b
Texas Instruments v. Cypress Semiconductor
90 F.3d 1558 (Fed. Cir. 1996) Cited 256 times 15 Legal Analyses
Holding that conclusory expert testimony as to the overall similarity of a claim limitation and the alleged corresponding element in the accused product was insufficient to establish equivalence under the doctrine of equivalents
Lyon v. Chase Bank U.S.
656 F.3d 877 (9th Cir. 2011) Cited 152 times
Reversing dismissal of plaintiff's claim that Chase Bank "violated Oregon Revised Statutes 646.639(k) by attempting to collect a debt when it knew or had reason to know that its right to do so did not exist"
Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia
841 F.2d 1133 (D.C. Cir. 1988) Cited 228 times
Holding that Rule 60(b) is not substitute for failure to appeal
Bio-Technology General Corp. v. Genentech
80 F.3d 1553 (Fed. Cir. 1996) Cited 135 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding in the context of laches that "[w]ith no legal right to enforce, it cannot be said that Genentech unreasonably delayed during that time period [before FDA approval and launch]."
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 345,981 times 922 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Section 1659 - Stay of certain actions pending disposition of related proceedings before the United States International Trade Commission
28 U.S.C. § 1659 Cited 121 times 5 Legal Analyses
Distinguishing between civil actions and proceedings before the International Trade Commission, and permitting stay of civil action in favor of overlapping ITC proceedings in certain circumstances

Technology Properties Limited, LLC v. Canon, Inc. et al

20 Cited authorities

Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

Holding that considerations of fairness and equity do not vitiate the res judicata effect of a previous, unappealed judgment, even if that judgment "rest on a legal principle subsequently overruled in another case"

Holding that the court "may take judicial notice of undisputed matters of public record . . . including documents on file in federal or state courts"

Holding that petitioners were not entitled to relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) when they made a "free, calculated, deliberate choic[e]" not to appeal

Holding that Rule 12(c) and Rule 12(b) motions differ in time of filing but are otherwise "functionally identical," and applying the same standard of review

Holding where allegedly omitted information was part of the "total mix of information" available, plaintiff could not state a claim under § 10b

Holding that conclusory expert testimony as to the overall similarity of a claim limitation and the alleged corresponding element in the accused product was insufficient to establish equivalence under the doctrine of equivalents

Reversing dismissal of plaintiff's claim that Chase Bank "violated Oregon Revised Statutes 646.639(k) by attempting to collect a debt when it knew or had reason to know that its right to do so did not exist"

Holding that Rule 60(b) is not substitute for failure to appeal

Holding in the context of laches that "[w]ith no legal right to enforce, it cannot be said that Genentech unreasonably delayed during that time period [before FDA approval and launch]."

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Distinguishing between civil actions and proceedings before the International Trade Commission, and permitting stay of civil action in favor of overlapping ITC proceedings in certain circumstances