Shelton v. Am. Motors Corp.
805 F.2d 1323 (8th Cir. 1986) Cited 715 times 9 Legal AnalysesHolding that an attempt to depose an attorney about documents her client possessed was protected by the work product privilege, as this knowledge would reflect her judgment as an attorney in identifying, examining, and selecting from her client's voluminous files those documents on which she relied in preparing her client's defense
Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.
689 F.2d 715 (7th Cir. 1982) Cited 358 timesHolding that the Seventh Circuit has long viewed attorney disqualification as a "drastic measure," and warning that motions for disqualification "should be viewed with extreme caution" given their potential misuse as "techniques of harassment"
Avery Dennison Corp. v. Minnesota Mining Manufacturing Co.
C.A. No. 01-125-JJF (D. Del. Oct. 26, 2001) Cited 1 times 1 Legal AnalysesC.A. No. 01-125-JJF October 26, 2001 Robert W. Whetzel, Esquire of Richards, Layton Finger, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorney for Plaintiff. William J. Marsden, Jr., Esquire of Fish Richardson, P.C., Wilmington, Delaware, Attorney for Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION JOSEPH J. FARNAN, JR., United States District Judge. Presently before the Court is the Joint Request To Resolve An Issue Relating To A Stipulated Form Of Protective Order (D.I. 58) filed by Plaintiff Avery Dennison Corp. (hereinafter "Avery")
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 95,836 times 658 Legal AnalysesAdopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
Rule 615 - Excluding Witnesses from the Courtroom; Preventing an Excluded Witness's Access to Trial Testimony
Fed. R. Evid. 615 Cited 1,363 times 7 Legal AnalysesFinding that a motion to exclude a witness from the courtroom is generally grantable as of right and on the court's own motion