§Why CasetextPricing

Tatung Company Ltd v. Shu Tze Hsu et al

MEMORANDUM in Support an Order Authorizing Service of Complaint Under FRCP Rule 4

20 Cited authorities

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr. Co.

    339 U.S. 306 (1950)   Cited 10,422 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process requires a hearing "appropriate to the nature of the case"

  2. Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio Intern. Interlink

    284 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 1,488 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding website-operator defendant's magazine advertisements supported the exercise of jurisdiction where defendant also ran local radio advertisements

  3. In re International Telemedia Associates, Inc.

    245 B.R. 713 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2000)   Cited 77 times
    Granting Rule 4(f) motion approving service to defendant's last-known email address

  4. Forum Financial Group v. President and Fellows of Harvard

    199 F.R.D. 22 (D. Me. 2001)   Cited 74 times
    Authorizing service by certified mail to defendant's attorney

  5. Brown v. China Integrated Energy, Inc.

    285 F.R.D. 560 (C.D. Cal. 2012)   Cited 41 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting plaintiffs' motion to effect alternative service by serving corporate defendant's U.S.-based counsel

  6. In re LDK Solar Securities Litigation

    No. C 07-05182 WHA (N.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2008)   Cited 40 times
    Approving Rule 4(f) service when, "plaintiffs have shown the difficulty of serving the unserved defendants located abroad" and "[d]efense counsel have refused to accept service on behalf of the unserved defendants on the ground that they do not represent the international defendants."

  7. Popular Enterprises, LLC v. Webcom Media Group, Inc.

    225 F.R.D. 560 (E.D. Tenn. 2004)   Cited 40 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that service by email was warranted

  8. Chanel, Inc. v. Zhixian

    CASE NO. 10-CV-60585-COHN/SELTZER (S.D. Fla. Apr. 29, 2010)   Cited 26 times
    Authorizing alternate service of process on foreign defendant located in China

  9. Ryan v. Brunswick Corporation

    02-CV-0133E(F) (W.D.N.Y. May. 31, 2002)   Cited 25 times
    Allowing e-mail service because Taiwan is not a party to the Hague Convention or any other relevant international agreements

  10. Cosmetech International, LLC v. Der Kwei Enterprise & Co.

    943 F. Supp. 311 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)   Cited 30 times
    Holding that service of process on Taiwanese cosmetics manufacturer, via personal service on its general manager and vice-president of sales, was valid under FRCvP 4(f) where the court found that "Taiwan is not a party to the Hague Convention. However, Taiwan law expressly permits service upon a corporation by delivery to `the manager concerned.' See Taiwan Code of Civil Procedure Article 131."

  11. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 71,368 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time