38 Cited authorities

  1. Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office Solution

    513 F.3d 1038 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 850 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff who had already filed a fraud suit under the Sherman Act, Lanham Act, and RICO had standing to seek a declaration that the defendant's fraudulently procured contracts were invalid
  2. Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co.

    108 F.3d 1134 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 681 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendants cannot be liable for false advertising when they were not "responsible for disseminating the offending advertisements"
  3. Lipton v. Nature Co.

    71 F.3d 464 (2d Cir. 1995)   Cited 503 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant's claim that he conducted "thorough" research was nonactionable puffery
  4. Coastal Abstract Service v. First Amer. Title

    173 F.3d 725 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 358 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding actionable under § 43(B) a statement that an escrow agent was not paying his bills
  5. Glen Holly Entertainment v. Tektronix Inc.

    343 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 274 times
    Holding that "generalized, vague, and unspecific assertions constitute[e] mere 'puffery' upon which a reasonable consumer [cannot] rely."
  6. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.

    59 Cal.2d 57 (Cal. 1963)   Cited 868 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding a manufacturer's liability should be imposed irrespective of fault
  7. In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation

    754 F. Supp. 2d 1145 (C.D. Cal. 2010)   Cited 193 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that one or more named plaintiffs may satisfy the notice requirements of section1782 on behalf of the entire putative class
  8. Castrol Inc. v. Pennzoil Co.

    987 F.2d 939 (3d Cir. 1993)   Cited 306 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a plaintiff must prove either literal falsity or consumer confusion, but not both”
  9. Sanders v. Apple Inc.

    672 F. Supp. 2d 978 (N.D. Cal. 2009)   Cited 172 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting motion to strike with leave to amend to define a narrower class
  10. Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

    838 F. Supp. 2d 929 (C.D. Cal. 2012)   Cited 141 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Song-Beverley does not impose a privity requirement
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,620 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 3532 - Idle acts

    Cal. Civ. Code § 3532   Cited 349 times

    The law neither does nor requires idle acts. Ca. Civ. Code § 3532 Enacted 1872.

  13. Section 2607 - Effect of acceptance; notice of breach; burden of establishing breach after acceptance; notice of claim or litigation to person answerable over

    Cal. Com. Code § 2607   Cited 108 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that a buyer "must, within a reasonable time after he or she discovers or should have discovered any breach, notify the seller of the breach or be barred from any remedy"
  14. Section 1910.66 - Powered platforms for building maintenance

    29 C.F.R. § 1910.66   Cited 5 times

    (a)Scope. This section covers powered platform installations permanently dedicated to interior or exterior building maintenance of a specific structure or group of structures. This section does not apply to suspended scaffolds (swinging scaffolds) used to service buildings on a temporary basis and covered under subpart D of this part, nor to suspended scaffolds used for construction work and covered under subpart L of 29 CFR part 1926. Building maintenance includes, but is not limited to, such tasks

  15. Section 3280.802 - Definitions

    24 C.F.R. § 3280.802

    (a) The following definitions are applicable to subpart I only. (1)Accessible (i) (As applied to equipment) means admitting close approach because not guarded by locked doors, elevation, or other effective means. (See readily accessible.) (ii) (As applied to wiring methods) means capable of being removed or exposed without damaging the manufactured home structure or finish, or not permanently closed-in by the structure or finish of the manufactured home (see concealed and exposed). (2)Air conditioning