553 U.S. 591 (2008) Cited 2,568 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that a class-of-one equal-protection claim cannot be raised in the public-employment context based in part upon the discretionary nature of the employment decisions
544 U.S. 709 (2005) Cited 2,139 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that section 3 of the RULPA, which increased level of protection of prisoners' and other incarcerated persons' religious rights, did not violate the Establishment Clause
567 U.S. 519 (2012) Cited 960 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 was not a valid exercise of the Commerce Clause power after focusing solely on whether it regulated "economic activity" without discussing the remaining Morrison factors
523 U.S. 296 (1998) Cited 1,474 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim that "rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or indeed may not occur at all" is not ripe for adjudication
473 U.S. 568 (1985) Cited 1,259 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that a challenge to a statutory system of arbitration was ripe because the plaintiffs' "injury [was] not a function of whether the [arbitration] tribunal awards reasonable compensation but of the tribunal's authority to adjudicate the dispute"
42 U.S.C. § 1988 Cited 21,832 times 43 Legal Analyses
Finding that 28 U.S.C. § 1920 defines the term "costs" as used in Rule 54(d) and enumerates the expenses that a federal court may tax as a cost under the discretionary authority granted in Rule 54(d)
26 U.S.C. § 1402 Cited 311 times 25 Legal Analyses
Defining "net earnings from self-employment" as "the gross income [minus exclusions from gross income] derived by an individual from any trade or business carried on by such individual"