10 Cited authorities

Ideal Instruments v. Rivard Instruments
434 F. Supp. 2d 598 (N.D. Iowa 2006) Cited 24 times
Holding statement made to third party that competitor was violating patent laws to be statement of fact
Gerlach v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co.
448 F. Supp. 1168 (E.D. Mich. 1978) Cited 53 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that individual offices of the Michigan Bell Telephone Company were individual establishments where employees were not often transferred between offices and a substantial portion of their supervision was in the local office
Finnegan v. University of Rochester Medical Center
180 F.R.D. 247 (W.D.N.Y. 1998) Cited 16 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that state statute requiring that complaint in medical malpractice action be accompanied by certificate of merit is a substantive law that applies in a federal diversity action
Brocksopp Engineering, Inc. v. Bach-Simpson Ltd.
136 F.R.D. 485 (E.D. Wis. 1991) Cited 23 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that requiring an answer to unchallenged claims would result in duplicative sets of pleadings in the event the 12(b) motion is denied and cause confusion
Oil Express Nat., Inc. v. D'Alessandro
173 F.R.D. 219 (N.D. Ill. 1997) Cited 12 times
Extending time to answer counts not addressed in motion to dismiss for 10 days after the court's ruling on the counts challenged in the 12(b) motion
Bertaut v. Parrish of Jefferson
Civil Action No: 02-2104, Section: "R"(5) (E.D. La. Nov. 8, 2002) Cited 2 times
Civil Action No. 02-2104 Section: "R" (5) November 8, 2002 ORDER AND REASONS SARAH S. VANCE, United States District Judge Before the Court is the motion of defendant, Parish of Jefferson, to dismiss plaintiff's claims of civil rights violations on the basis of prescription under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Also before the Court is the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment, seeking a default against defendant. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS defendant's motion to dismiss
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 354,229 times 943 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Section 2000e - Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e Cited 52,069 times 130 Legal Analyses
Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions
Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 Cited 50,129 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."
Section 2000bb - Congressional findings and declaration of purposes
42 U.S.C. § 2000bb Cited 1,557 times 18 Legal Analyses
Finding that in Smith, "the Supreme Court virtually eliminated the requirement that the government justify burdens on religious exercise imposed by laws neutral toward religion"

Tagore v. United States of America

10 Cited authorities

Holding statement made to third party that competitor was violating patent laws to be statement of fact

Finding that individual offices of the Michigan Bell Telephone Company were individual establishments where employees were not often transferred between offices and a substantial portion of their supervision was in the local office

Holding that state statute requiring that complaint in medical malpractice action be accompanied by certificate of merit is a substantive law that applies in a federal diversity action

Holding that requiring an answer to unchallenged claims would result in duplicative sets of pleadings in the event the 12(b) motion is denied and cause confusion

Extending time to answer counts not addressed in motion to dismiss for 10 days after the court's ruling on the counts challenged in the 12(b) motion

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions

Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."

Finding that in Smith, "the Supreme Court virtually eliminated the requirement that the government justify burdens on religious exercise imposed by laws neutral toward religion"