§Why CasetextPricing

Svenson v. Google, Inc. et al

REPLY

46 Cited authorities

  1. Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA

    568 U.S. 398 (2013)   Cited 3,378 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding no standing existed where alleged injury was "based on hypothetical future harm that is not certainly impending."

  2. Villiarimo v. Aloha Island Air, Inc.

    281 F.3d 1054 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 2,900 times
    Holding it was irrelevant whether an employee who was fired for lying during an investigation had actually lied

  3. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court

    51 Cal.4th 310 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 1,618 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the standards for establishing standing under section 17204 and eligibility for restitution under section 17203 are wholly distinct"

  4. Keenan v. Allan

    91 F.3d 1275 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 2,207 times
    Holding that it is not the district court's role “to scour the record in search of a genuine issue of triable fact”

  5. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.

    222 Cal.App.3d 1371 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 942 times
    Holding that a claim for breach of the implied covenant may be disregarded if it rests on the same set of facts as a claim for breach of contract

  6. Rubio v. Capital One Bank

    613 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 408 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that closing a credit card account and losing the credit extended by the bank and/or keeping an account open and accepting a higher APR would result in economic injury sufficient for UCL standing

  7. Birdsong v. Apple

    590 F.3d 955 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 337 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that hypothetical injury was insufficient for standing

  8. Sybersound Records, Inc. v. UAV Corp.

    517 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 329 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the licensing status of a copyrighted recording does not give rise to a claim under § 1125(B)

  9. Lierboe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    350 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 230 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if a plaintiff has no individual claim for relief, she cannot serve as a representative of a class who may have such a claim

  10. Pyramid Techs., Inc. v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.

    752 F.3d 807 (9th Cir. 2014)   Cited 136 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that trial court abused its discretion in determining witness with 38 years of experience in property damage repair was not qualified as an expert

  11. Section 3301 - Clearly ascertainable in nature and origin

    Cal. Civ. Code § 3301   Cited 185 times
    Requiring damages to be "clearly ascertainable in both their nature and origin"

  12. Section 3360 - Nominal damages

    Cal. Civ. Code § 3360   Cited 104 times   1 Legal Analyses

    When a breach of duty has caused no appreciable detriment to the party affected, he may yet recover nominal damages. Ca. Civ. Code § 3360 Enacted 1872.

  13. Section 22576 - Violation

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 22576   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses

    An operator of a commercial Web site or online service that collects personally identifiable information through the Web site or online service from individual consumers who use or visit the commercial Web site or online service and who reside in California shall be in violation of this section if the operator fails to comply with the provisions of Section 22575 or with the provisions of its posted privacy policy in either of the following ways: (a) Knowingly and willfully. (b) Negligently and materially

  14. Section 22575 - Privacy policy

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 22575   Cited 11 times   45 Legal Analyses

    (a) An operator of a commercial Web site or online service that collects personally identifiable information through the Internet about individual consumers residing in California who use or visit its commercial Web site or online service shall conspicuously post its privacy policy on its Web site, or in the case of an operator of an online service, make that policy available in accordance with paragraph (5) of subdivision (b) of Section 22577. An operator shall be in violation of this subdivision

  15. Section 22577 - Definitions

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 22577   Cited 1 times   6 Legal Analyses

    For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions apply: (a) The term "personally identifiable information" means individually identifiable information about an individual consumer collected online by the operator from that individual and maintained by the operator in an accessible form, including any of the following: (1) A first and last name. (2) A home or other physical address, including street name and name of a city or town. (3) An e-mail address. (4) A telephone number. (5) A social