§Why CasetextPricing

Sussex et al v. Turnberry/MGM Grand Towers, LLC et al

RESPONSE to 124 Emergency MOTION to Stay

15 Cited authorities

  1. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

    555 U.S. 7 (2008)   Cited 17,492 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding that preliminary injunctions "may only be awarded upon a clear showing that the plaintiff is entitled to such relief"

  2. Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter

    569 U.S. 564 (2013)   Cited 733 times   79 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when determining whether to vacate an Award under Section 10 of the FAA, "an arbitral decision even arguably construing or applying the contract must stand, regardless of a court's view of its (de)merits"

  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.

    449 U.S. 232 (1980)   Cited 619 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the issuance of an administrative complaint is not final agency action because a complaint is "not a definitive statement of position" but instead a "threshold determination that further inquiry is warranted"

  4. Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Co.

    415 U.S. 1 (1974)   Cited 405 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the enumeration of specific types of equitable authority in the Freedom of Information Act did not preclude district courts from granting non-enumerated injunctive relief

  5. Positive Software v. Mortg

    476 F.3d 278 (5th Cir. 2007)   Cited 88 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Justice White's concurrence controls and endorsing a practically-oriented "reasonable impression of bias" standard

  6. Petroleum Co. v. Comm'n

    304 U.S. 209 (1938)   Cited 153 times
    Granting of equitable relief "rests in the sound discretion of the court."

  7. ANR Coal Co. v. Cogentrix of North Carolina, Inc.

    173 F.3d 493 (4th Cir. 1999)   Cited 71 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mere nondisclosure does not itself justify vacatur

  8. New Regency v. Nippon Herald

    501 F.3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the arbitrator’s new employment triggered duty to investigate possible conflicts

  9. Trustmark Ins. v. John Hancock Life Ins. Co.

    631 F.3d 869 (7th Cir. 2011)   Cited 34 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Determining "disinterested," as used in arbitration agreement, "means lacking a financial or other personal stake in the outcome"

  10. Smith v. American Arbitration Ass'n, Inc.

    233 F.3d 502 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 25 times
    Holding arbitration is a "private self-help remedy" and holding no state action in context of equal protection violation claim on the basis of all male arbitration panel

  11. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 23,068 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  12. Section 10 - Same; vacation; grounds; rehearing

    9 U.S.C. § 10   Cited 5,532 times   104 Legal Analyses
    Vacating arbitration award appropriate " where the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means; where there was evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators, or either of them; where the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, upon sufficient cause shown, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy; or of any other misbehavior by which the rights of any party have been prejudiced; or where the arbitrators exceeded their powers, or so imperfectly executed them that a mutual, final, and definite award upon the subject matter submitted was not made."