§Why CasetextPricing

Sussex et al v. Turnberry/MGM Grand Towers, LLC et al

MOTION to Lift Stay re Order, 63 Order,, Set/Reset Deadlines, MOTION TO LIFT STAY OF ARBITRATION

9 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 257,305 times   280 Legal Analyses
    Holding for a complaint to survive Rule 12(b), it must "state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face"

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 270,937 times   367 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

  3. AT&T Techs., Inc. v. Commc'ns Workers of Am.

    475 U.S. 643 (1986)   Cited 5,420 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it was for the court to decide whether a particular labor dispute fell within the arbitration clause of a collective-bargaining agreement

  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.

    388 U.S. 395 (1967)   Cited 2,960 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts are the proper forum to evaluate a challenge to the validity of an arbitration clause, but that where the entire agreement of which an arbitration clause is but a part is challenged, such evaluation is properly left to the arbitrator

  5. Jackson v. Hayakawa

    682 F.2d 1344 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 670 times
    Holding that the Regents is "considered to be an instrumentalit[y] of the state, and therefore enjoy the same immunity as the state of California."

  6. Ace Am. Ins. Co. v. Huntsman Corp.

    255 F.R.D. 179 (S.D. Tex. 2008)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Opining the plaintiffs’ "have alleged a concrete injury--that they are being deprived of their contractual right to arbitrate--and that this injury is caused by [the defendants’] refusal to arbitrate under the Reinsurance Certificates’ dispute-resolution provisions."

  7. Axa Equitable Life Ins. Co. v. Infinity Fin. Grp., LLC

    608 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (S.D. Fla. 2009)   Cited 10 times
    Stating that “[c]hoice of law provisions can be waived where the parties fail to raise the issue with the Court either by objection or by failing to cite to the law provided for in the choice of law provision.”

  8. Hires Parts Service, Inc. v. NCR Corp.

    859 F. Supp. 349 (N.D. Ind. 1994)   Cited 10 times

    Civ. No. 1:94cv102. August 5, 1994. Eric E. Snouffer, Snouffer and Snouffer, Fort Wayne, IN, Lynn Lincoln Sarko, Mark Griffin, Keller, Rohrback, Seattle, WA, Donald L. Perelman, Melinda L. deLisle, Jeffrey S. Istvan, Fine Kaplan and Black, Philadelphia, PA, John W. Boyd, Joseph Goldberg, Freedman Boyd Daniels Peifer, Hollander Guttman Goldberg, Albuquerque, NM, for plaintiff. Robert E. Connolly, O'Dowd Wyneken and Connolly, Fort Wayne, IN, for defendant. ORDER WILLIAM C. LEE, District Judge. This

  9. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,480 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system