25 Cited authorities

  1. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 280,791 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  2. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 242,291 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence is "so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law"
  3. T.W. Elec. Service v. Pacific Elec. Contr

    809 F.2d 626 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 10,158 times
    Holding that "[i]nferences must ... be drawn in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party" so long as "it is ‘rational’ or ‘reasonable’ and otherwise permissible under the governing substantive law"
  4. Nissan Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Fritz Co.

    210 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 4,552 times
    Holding that once the moving party carries its initial burden of production, "the nonmoving parties were obligated to produce evidence in response"
  5. Ray v. Henderson

    217 F.3d 1234 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 1,326 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that for purposes of a Title VII retaliation claim, "an action is cognizable as an adverse employment action if it is reasonably likely to deter employees from engaging in protected activity"
  6. Humphrey v. Memorial Hospitals Ass'n

    239 F.3d 1128 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 582 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer had a duty to accommodate employee with obsessive compulsive disorder, which interfered with her ability to get to work on time, or at all, but did not affect her ability to function effectively as a medical transcriptionist
  7. Wasco Products v. Southwall Technologies

    435 F.3d 989 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 466 times
    Holding that conspiracy-based justification for tolling statute of limitations must be included in pleadings, "even where the tolling argument is raised in opposition to summary judgment," because "'summary judgment is not a procedural second chance to flesh out inadequate pleadings'"
  8. Zukle v. Regents of the University of California

    166 F.3d 1041 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 549 times
    Holding that the anti-discrimination provision of § 504 requires the plaintiff to show that she is "otherwise qualified" for the position at issue
  9. Hansen v. U.S.

    7 F.3d 137 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 650 times
    Holding that Certificate of Assessment on Form 4340 is probative evidence in and of itself and, in the absence of contrary evidence, shows that notices and assessments were properly made
  10. Picken v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc.

    457 F.3d 963 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 421 times
    Holding that a plaintiff could not raise new allegations supporting her claim for the first time at summary judgment
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 337,668 times   161 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 164,455 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Rule 41 - Dismissal of Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 41   Cited 116,268 times   200 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such dismissal "operates as an adjudication on the merits"
  14. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,665 times   130 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions
  15. Section 12102 - Definition of disability

    42 U.S.C. § 12102   Cited 11,196 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing ADA claim where plaintiff is "regarded as" disabled
  16. Section 705 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 705   Cited 1,092 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the definition of disability set forth in § 12102