§Why CasetextPricing

Sun Chemical Corporation v. Fike Corporation et al

REPLY BRIEF to Opposition to Motion

10 Cited authorities

  1. Simmons v. City of Philadelphia

    947 F.2d 1042 (3d Cir. 1991)   Cited 594 times
    Holding that city policymakers, who owed an independent duty to pretrial detainees, were individually liable under § 1983 for prisoner suicide, even though factfinder determined that the turnkey had not violated prisoner's constitutional rights

  2. Laborers' Int'l Union v. Foster Wheeler Energy

    26 F.3d 375 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 513 times
    Holding issues not raised in opening brief on appeal are waived

  3. Santiago v. City of Vineland

    107 F. Supp. 2d 512 (D.N.J. 2000)   Cited 122 times
    Holding individual defendants liable under Section 1981 because they were involved in the plaintiff's discharge

  4. Bayer AG v. Schein Pharmaceutical, Inc.

    129 F. Supp. 2d 705 (D.N.J. 2001)   Cited 85 times
    Striking portions of reply

  5. Hundred East Credit Corp. v. Eric Schuster

    212 N.J. Super. 350 (App. Div. 1986)   Cited 127 times
    Holding that CFA applied to sale of computer peripherals to business

  6. Stockroom, Inc. v. Dydacomp Dev. Corp.

    941 F. Supp. 2d 537 (D.N.J. 2013)   Cited 53 times
    Finding the plaintiff business to be a "consumer" under the CFA in connection with the plaintiff's purchase of order-processing software from defendant business

  7. Elizabethtown Water Co. v. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co.

    998 F. Supp. 447 (D.N.J. 1998)   Cited 51 times
    Finding that "[i]t is axiomatic that reply briefs should respond to the respondent's arguments or explain a position in the initial brief that the respondent has refuted"

  8. Dana Transport, Inc. v. Ableco Finance, LLC

    Civil Action No. 04-2781 (D.N.J. Aug. 17, 2005)   Cited 20 times
    Explaining that "arguments raised for the first time in defendant's reply brief will be disregarded"

  9. Dreier Co., Inc. v. Unitronix Corp.

    218 N.J. Super. 260 (App. Div. 1986)   Cited 45 times
    Finding sale of custom programmed software to business entity was within scope of NJCFA

  10. Section 56:8-2 - Fraud, etc., in connection with sale or advertisement of merchandise or real estate as unlawful practice

    N.J. Stat. § 56:8-2   Cited 1,245 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting "any unconscionable commercial practice, deception, fraud, false pretense, false promise, misrepresentation, or the knowing concealment, suppression, or omission of any material fact"