49 Cited authorities

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009) Cited 255,413 times 280 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife
504 U.S. 555 (1992) Cited 28,088 times 139 Legal Analyses
Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"
Village of Willowbrook v. Olech
528 U.S. 562 (2000) Cited 6,421 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that a class of one could challenge different treatment under the Equal Protection Clause where treatment was alleged to be "irrational and wholly arbitrary"
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Meyer
510 U.S. 471 (1994) Cited 7,069 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding a Bivens claim does not lie against federal agencies because, if damages claims were permitted against federal agencies, "there would be no reason for aggrieved parties to bring damages actions against individual officers" and thus "the deterrent effects of the Bivens remedy would be lost"
Spencer v. Kemna
523 U.S. 1 (1998) Cited 5,632 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that an issue is moot when "there is nothing for us to remedy"
Daimlerchrysler Corp. v. Cuno
547 U.S. 332 (2006) Cited 2,692 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that an injury a plaintiff "suffers in some indefinite way in common with people generally" is not a cognizable injury-in-fact
Warth v. Seldin
422 U.S. 490 (1975) Cited 11,940 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that Article III requires plaintiffs "to establish that, in fact, the asserted injury was the consequence of the defendants' actions"
Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.
494 U.S. 472 (1990) Cited 3,336 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding mootness destroys subject-matter jurisdiction
Harris v. Mills
572 F.3d 66 (2d Cir. 2009) Cited 6,629 times
Holding that notice and opportunity to be heard before deprivation of constitutionally protected interest coupled with Article 78 post-deprivation remedy satisfied due process
Bender v. Williamsport Area School Dist
475 U.S. 534 (1986) Cited 2,912 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a school board member sued in his official capacity was bound by the board’s litigation decisions and could not file his own notice of appeal
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 348,708 times 930 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Section 1346 - United States as defendant
28 U.S.C. § 1346 Cited 24,150 times 23 Legal Analyses
Determining liability to the claimant "in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred"
Section 1985 - Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
42 U.S.C. § 1985 Cited 19,930 times 10 Legal Analyses
Concerning conspiracies to obstruct justice or intimidate a party, witness, or juror
Section 2284 - Three-judge court; when required; composition; procedure
28 U.S.C. § 2284 Cited 1,791 times 4 Legal Analyses
Providing for the convention of such a court whenever an action is filed challenging the constitutionality of apportionment of legislative districts
Section 15 - Counting electoral votes in Congress
3 U.S.C. § 15 Cited 72 times 1 Legal Analyses
Using the word "decide" or "decision" six times in reference to Congress's responsibilities during the certification proceeding

Strunk v. The State of California et al

49 Cited authorities

Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

Holding that a class of one could challenge different treatment under the Equal Protection Clause where treatment was alleged to be "irrational and wholly arbitrary"

Holding a Bivens claim does not lie against federal agencies because, if damages claims were permitted against federal agencies, "there would be no reason for aggrieved parties to bring damages actions against individual officers" and thus "the deterrent effects of the Bivens remedy would be lost"

Holding that an issue is moot when "there is nothing for us to remedy"

Holding that an injury a plaintiff "suffers in some indefinite way in common with people generally" is not a cognizable injury-in-fact

Holding that Article III requires plaintiffs "to establish that, in fact, the asserted injury was the consequence of the defendants' actions"

Holding mootness destroys subject-matter jurisdiction

Holding that notice and opportunity to be heard before deprivation of constitutionally protected interest coupled with Article 78 post-deprivation remedy satisfied due process

Holding that a school board member sued in his official capacity was bound by the board’s litigation decisions and could not file his own notice of appeal

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Determining liability to the claimant "in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred"

Concerning conspiracies to obstruct justice or intimidate a party, witness, or juror

Providing for the convention of such a court whenever an action is filed challenging the constitutionality of apportionment of legislative districts

Using the word "decide" or "decision" six times in reference to Congress's responsibilities during the certification proceeding