§Why CasetextPricing

Stevo Design, Inc. v. SBR Marketing Ltd.

RESPONSE to 49 MOTION to Amend/Correct 45 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 59

18 Cited authorities

  1. School District No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc.

    5 F.3d 1255 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 4,969 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "overwhelming weight of authority is that the failure to file documents in an original motion or opposition does not turn the late filed documents into 'newly discovered evidence'" for a motion for reconsideration

  2. Mavrix Photo Inc. v. Brand Techs. Inc.

    647 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 1,013 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the defendant expressly aimed the content of "celebrity-gossip.net" at California because the site had a specific focus on the California-centric entertainment industry

  3. Brayton Purcell LLP v. Recordon & Recordon

    606 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 665 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in copyright infringement actions, 28 U.S.C. § 1400 "allow venue in any judicial district where, if treated as a separate state, the defendant would be subject to personal jurisdiction."

  4. Sher v. Johnson

    911 F.2d 1357 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 1,090 times
    Holding that, in states with statutes identical in all relevant respects to Wash. Rev. Code § 25.05.100, the actions of one partner do not impute to another partner for purposes of personal jurisdiction

  5. Zimmerman v. City of Oakland

    255 F.3d 734 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 726 times
    Holding post-deprivation remedies inadequate where a state officer “acted pursuant to some established procedure,” as opposed to in “random, unpredictable, and unauthorized ways”

  6. Herman Family Revocable Trust v. Teddy Bear

    254 F.3d 802 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 499 times
    Holding that "supplemental jurisdiction cannot exist without original jurisdiction."

  7. Bahrampour v. Lampert

    356 F.3d 969 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 377 times
    Holding prison officials may prohibit receipt of sexually explicit materials in light of concerns about preventing the sexual harassment of prison guards and other inmates

  8. Myers v. Bennett Law Offices

    238 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 363 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the “locus of the injury” is “a relevant factor” when analyzing venue under § 1391(b)

  9. Scott v. Pasadena Unified School Dist

    306 F.3d 646 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 232 times
    Holding that, where students challenged schools' admissions policies but during the course of litigation became ineligible to apply to those schools, the students' claims were moot

  10. Satey v. Jpmorgan

    521 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 171 times
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by retaining supplemental jurisdiction over remaining state law claims because judicial economy and convenience to the parties were better accommodated by hearing the claims

  11. Section 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction

    28 U.S.C. § 1367   Cited 65,812 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"

  12. Rule 59 - New Trial; Altering or Amending a Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 59   Cited 45,382 times   70 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a motion to alter or amend judgment must be filed within 28 days after entry of judgment