6 Cited authorities

Walker v. Lakewood Condo. Owners Ass'n
186 F.R.D. 584 (C.D. Cal. 1999) Cited 99 times
Explaining that generalized objections are inadequate
USF INSURANCE COMPANY v. SMITH'S FOOD DRUG CENTER
2:10-cv-001513-RLH-LRL (D. Nev. Jun. 16, 2011) Cited 3 times
2:10-cv-001513-RLH-LRL. June 16, 2011 ORDER LAWRENCE LEAVITT, Magistrate Judge Before the court is plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Responses (#15). The court has considered the motion (#15), defendant's Opposition (#17), and plaintiff's Reply (#24). Plaintiff, USF Insurance Company ("USF"), filed this case on September 3, 2010, to obtain a determination of its rights and obligations to defendant, Smith's Food and Drug Center #377 ("Smith's"), in an underlying action. On December 7, 2010, the
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 95,870 times 659 Legal Analyses
Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 Cited 46,275 times 322 Legal Analyses
Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness
Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination
Fed. R. Civ. P. 30 Cited 16,211 times 128 Legal Analyses
Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely
Rule 34 - Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes
Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 Cited 13,229 times 149 Legal Analyses
Finding that the rules related to electronic discovery were "not meant to create a routine right of direct access to a party's electronic information system, although such access may be justified in some circumstances."

Stevo Design, Inc. v. SBR Marketing Ltd.

6 Cited authorities

Walker v. Lakewood Condo. Owners Ass'n

Explaining that generalized objections are inadequate

USF INSURANCE COMPANY v. SMITH'S FOOD DRUG CENTER

Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness

Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination

Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely

Rule 34 - Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes

Finding that the rules related to electronic discovery were "not meant to create a routine right of direct access to a party's electronic information system, although such access may be justified in some circumstances."