Holding that official capacity state officer suits for prospective injunctive relief are suits against a "person" under § 1983 even though a "State" is not a "person" under that statute
Holding that the case did not fall within Dean's "limited exception" to the rule against fictitious-party pleading because the description of the Doe defendant was insufficient to enable service
Holding that sovereign immunity bars a suit against the state when the claim for injunctive relief is brought pursuant to common law and no waiver of immunity is applicable
Holding that a state's removal to federal court waives only the state's immunity-based objection to a federal forum but the state retains its general immunity from liability
Holding that sovereign immunity under Georgia constitution "is extended to the counties of the State of Georgia" but that state legislature may waive that immunity by law
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 Cited 90,251 times 91 Legal Analyses
Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint