10 Cited authorities

  1. Gould v. Alleco, Inc.

    883 F.2d 281 (4th Cir. 1989)   Cited 120 times
    Holding that intervention motion, filed after settlement proposal was presented to court, was untimely
  2. In re at & T Mobility Wireless Data Serv. Sales Tax Litig..

    789 F. Supp. 2d 935 (N.D. Ill. 2011)   Cited 34 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that postcard notice was " more than sufficient" despite not providing detailed information about class members' options and deadlines because website and claims administrator via phone did
  3. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation

    281 F.R.D. 531 (N.D. Cal. 2012)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that discovery sought from objectors was relevant to the settlement pending before the court
  4. In re Gen. Elec. Co.

    998 F. Supp. 2d 145 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that the evidentiary burden is on the party invoking an inability to pay and that conclusory statements are not sufficient to satisfy this burden
  5. In re Netflix Privacy Litigation

    Case No. 5:11-CV-00379-EJD (N.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 2013)   Cited 6 times

    Case No. 5:11-CV-00379-EJD 11-25-2013 IN RE: NETFLIX PRIVACY LITIGATION EDWARD J. DAVILA ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR APPEAL BONDS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY [Re: Docket Item Nos. 281 and 282] Presently before the Court in this class action litigation are Plaintiffs' (Jeff Milans, Peter Comstock, and the Class) Motion for Appeal Bonds and Motion for Additional Discovery. See Docket Item Nos. 281, 282. Plaintiffs ask that each Objector be required to post a bond

  6. In re Law Office of Jonathan E. Fortman, LLC

    Case No. 4:13MC00042 AGF (E.D. Mo. Feb. 1, 2013)   Cited 3 times
    Identifying Fortman as a "professional objector attorney"
  7. In re Navistar Diesel Engine Prods. Liab. Litig.

    Case No. 11 C 2496 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 12, 2013)   Cited 1 times

    Case No. 11 C 2496 MDL No. 2223 08-12-2013 In re: NAVISTAR DIESEL ENGINE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MATTHEW F.KENNELLY MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: Certain objectors to the court-approved settlement in this class action have filed notices of appeal. Under the terms of the settlement agreement between the plaintiff class and defendant Ford Motor Company, the pendency of an appeal operates as a stay on carrying out the settlement terms, including payment of claims

  8. Carnegie v. Household Intern., Inc.

    445 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (N.D. Ill. 2006)   Cited 6 times

    No. 98 C 2178. August 28, 2006. Ronald L. Futterman, Futterman Howard, Chtd., Melinda J. Morales, William Henry London, Much, Shelist, Freed, Denenberg, Ament Rubenstein, P.C., Chicago, IL, Carolyn C. Lindheim, Michael Coren, Michael B. Hyman, Steven E. Angstreich, Levy, Angstreich, Finney, Baldante, Rubenstein and Coren PC, Philadelphia, PA, Daniel Hume, Peter Linden, Roger W. Kirby, Kirby, Mcinerney Squire, LLP, New York City, George Robert Blakey, Notre Dame Law School, Notre Dame, IN, for Plaintiff

  9. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 48,543 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."
  10. Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 30   Cited 16,123 times   127 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely