2 Cited authorities

  1. Lentini v. California Center for the Arts

    370 F.3d 837 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 319 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that violating the ADA is a per se violation of the Unruh Act
  2. U.S. v. Mahon

    No. CR09-0712-02-PHX-DGC (D. Ariz. Jun. 23, 2011)

    No. CR09-0712-02-PHX-DGC. June 23, 2011 ORDER DAVID CAMPBELL, District Judge On August 11, 2009, the Court entered a ten-page order finding that Defendant Daniel Mahon should be detained pending trial. Doc. 44. The order found by clear and convincing evidence that Daniel Mahon is a danger to the community and by a preponderance of the evidence that Daniel Mahon is a flight risk. Id. at 8-9. On April 5, 2011, Daniel Mahon filed a motion asking the Court to revisit this issue. The motion argued that