14 Cited authorities

  1. Califano v. Yamasaki

    442 U.S. 682 (1979)   Cited 1,988 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that claimants could bring social security class action "at least so long as the membership of the class is limited to those who meet the requirements of § 205(g)"
  2. Perez v. Mortg. Bankers Ass'n

    575 U.S. 92 (2015)   Cited 278 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the APA "mandate that agencies use the same procedures when they amend or repeal a rule as they used to issue the rule in the first instance"
  3. United States v. Mendoza

    464 U.S. 154 (1984)   Cited 569 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding in an immigration context that the government could not be collaterally estopped from litigating a constitutional issue concerning its administration of the Nationality Act, adjudicated against it in a prior action brought by a different party
  4. Fund for Animals v. U.S. Bureau of Land Manag

    460 F.3d 13 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 111 times
    Holding that challenges to completed gathers are moot and therefore not justiciable
  5. General Elec. Co. v. E.P.A

    290 F.3d 377 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 95 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a purported Guidance Document was a legislative rule, not a policy statement, and thus reviewable
  6. Peoples Nat. Bank v. Office of Comptroller

    362 F.3d 333 (5th Cir. 2004)   Cited 87 times
    Concluding that agency notification was not consummation of decisionmaking process where regulated party had not yet utilized administrative appeal process
  7. Nat. Res. Def. Cncl. v. Envir. Protect. Agy.

    643 F.3d 311 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 56 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting final rule that allowed attainment of the 1997 NAAQS to permit termination of the fees control for the one-hour NAAQS
  8. Wenner v. Texas Lottery Comm'n

    123 F.3d 321 (5th Cir. 1997)   Cited 79 times

    No. 96-21074. September 30, 1997. Craig L. Stahl, Stephen J. Joncus, Bracewell Patterson, Houston, TX, Dale Ossip Johnson, Johnson Bearden, Austin, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Rick Brass, Houston, TX, Charles Richard Fine, Ray, Wood Fine, Austin, TX, for Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellant. Henry Clay McGuffey, Dewey E. Helcamp, III, Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. Before DUHE and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges, and COBB

  9. Davis County Solid Waste Mgt. v. U.S.E.P.A

    108 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 56 times
    Finding promulgated standard to be severable where EPA asserted in rehearing petition that, contrary to its position at oral argument, the standards could stand alone
  10. Lion Health Servs. v. Sebelius

    635 F.3d 693 (5th Cir. 2011)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Remanding to the agency to recalculate amounts owed in a manner consistent with the statute
  11. Section 667 - State jurisdiction and plans

    29 U.S.C. § 667   Cited 181 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Providing for transfer of jurisdiction