§Why CasetextPricing

State of Colorado et al v. Warner Chilcott Holdings Company III, Ltd. et al

REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION for Summary Judgment

22 Cited authorities

  1. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.

    551 U.S. 877 (2007)   Cited 459 times   74 Legal Analyses
    Holding that vertical agreements are not per se illegal

  2. National Soc. of Professional Engineers v. U.S.

    435 U.S. 679 (1978)   Cited 742 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding agreement among engineers to refuse to discuss prices with potential customers until after the initial selection of an engineer was per se illegal

  3. Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

    441 U.S. 1 (1979)   Cited 578 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding generally that blanket and per-program licenses by ASCAP and BMI were not per se antitrust violations, but rather these licenses, "when attacked, . . . should be subjected to a more discriminating examination under the rule of reason"

  4. Texaco v. Dagher

    547 U.S. 1 (2006)   Cited 245 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Finding such an agreement reasonable and not anti-competitive for purposes of § 1 liability

  5. Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society

    457 U.S. 332 (1982)   Cited 471 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that price fixing between medical organizations is per se unreasonable

  6. California Dental Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission

    526 U.S. 756 (1999)   Cited 203 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that full rule of reason analysis was required where challenged restraint "might plausibly be thought to have a net procompetitive effect, or possibly no effect at all on competition"

  7. Palmer v. BRG of Georgia, Inc.

    498 U.S. 46 (1990)   Cited 229 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding an agreement between bar review course providers dividing market territories for the purpose of raising prices was per se illegal

  8. Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Ass'n

    493 U.S. 411 (1990)   Cited 199 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding Noerr-Pennington inapplicable to lawyers' boycott aimed at increasing statutory compensation

  9. Geneva Pharmaceuticals Technology Corp. v. Barr Laboratories Inc.

    386 F.3d 485 (2d Cir. 2004)   Cited 372 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a member of a joint venture had standing to pursue claims for injuries to the joint venture

  10. Louisiana Wholesale Drug Co. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.

    332 F.3d 896 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 114 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding such agreements to be per se illegal