6 Cited authorities

  1. Adamson v. Bowen

    855 F.2d 668 (10th Cir. 1988)   Cited 357 times
    Holding that district court, in making class certification decision, should avoid focusing on merits of underlying class action
  2. Sofran v. LaBranche & Co., Inc.

    220 F.R.D. 398 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)   Cited 31 times
    Rejecting the argument that because the proposed lead plaintiff was not the beneficial owner of the shares that it could not serve as an adequate lead plaintiff
  3. Lane v. Page

    250 F.R.D. 634 (D.N.M. 2007)   Cited 14 times
    Distinguishing preceding cases because notice listed the case number, described allegations, and advised of right to seek lead plaintiff status
  4. In re Sprint Corporation Securities Litigation

    164 F. Supp. 2d 1240 (D. Kan. 2001)   Cited 9 times
    Holding that investor group could adequately represent class where court was unaware of any conflict that could impede representation and had no reason to question qualifications, experience, and abilities of selected counsel
  5. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 34,889 times   1234 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
  6. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 7,460 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party