550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 269,063 times 367 Legal Analyses
Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
Holding that a collateral attack on a prior "enhancement" conviction constitutes a "challenge [to] either `the pertinent judgment or claim'" within the meaning of § 2244(d)
Finding that there is sufficient detail in a billing report if counsel indicates "the type of legal services provided, the date the service was provided, the attorney providing the service . . . and the time spent in providing the service"
221 Ariz. 138 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009) Cited 92 times
Concluding trial court did not abuse its discretion in striking plaintiff's reply, dismissing his cross-claim, and entering judgment in favor of defendant