§Why CasetextPricing

Sorensen v. Digital Networks North America, Inc.

Reply to Opposition re MOTION for Partial Lift of Stay as to Defendant Legacy Support Services

7 Cited authorities

  1. Conc. Citizens Coalition of Stockton v. City

    128 Cal.App.4th 70 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 36 times

    No. C046524 April 4, 2005 Appeal from the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, No. CV020397, Bobby W. McNatt, Judge. Shute, Mihaly Weinberger, Rachel B. Hooper, Brian J. Johnson, Amy J. Bricker and Daniel P. Selmi for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Tom Greene, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Craig C. Thompson and Susan L. Durbin, Deputy Attorneys General, as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants. Stoel Rives, John Briscoe, Roderick W. Walston, Lawrence

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.

    169 F.2d 571 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 46 times
    In NLRB v. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 F.2d 571, 577 (6th Cir. 1945), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 905, 69 S.Ct. 411, 93 L.Ed. 441 (1949), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals specifically rejected the notion that the protection afforded by the National Labor Relations Act is a constitutional right.

  3. Talman v. Talman

    229 Cal.App.2d 39 (Cal. Ct. App. 1964)   Cited 16 times

    Docket No. 27809. August 5, 1964. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County dismissing an order to show cause re modification of support provisions of a divorce judgment. Roger Alton Pfaff, Judge. Affirmed. Crowley Goffin and Arthur J. Crowley for Plaintiff and Appellant. Brown Altshuler, Leo Altshuler and James J. Brown for Defendant and Respondent. LILLIE, J. Defendant wife was granted an interlocutory decree of divorce on May 8, 1952; it incorporated in haec verba a property

  4. Gardner v. Rich Mfg. Co.

    68 Cal.App.2d 725 (Cal. Ct. App. 1945)   Cited 40 times
    In Gardner v. Rich Mfg. Co., 68 Cal.App.2d 725 [ 158 P.2d 23] (hearing denied by the Supreme Court), at page 730 [2]-[3], it is said: "The schedule of minimum rates thereby established and prescribed and the rules and regulations governing the same become a part of every contract between a highway contract carrier and the shipper.

  5. Hendrie v. Lowmaster

    152 F.2d 83 (6th Cir. 1945)   Cited 28 times

    No. 10064. November 12, 1945. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division; Edward J. Moinet, Judge. Corporate reorganization proceedings under Bankruptcy Act, § 77B, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207, in the matter of the Michigan Buildings Company, corporate debtor. From order of District Court construing confirmation order to mean that unclaimed stock in hands of trustee be distributed to holders of all classes of stock, share and share alike, with

  6. Roraback v. Roraback

    38 Cal.App.2d 592 (Cal. Ct. App. 1940)   Cited 28 times
    In Roraback v. Roraback, 38 Cal.App.2d 592 [ 101 P.2d 772], in construing an order granting a partial new trial, the court referred to the reporter's transcript of both hearings to determine the trial court's intention in making the order; the court stated at page 596: "In construing orders they must always be considered in their entirety, and the same rules of interpretation will apply in ascertaining the meaning of a court's order as in ascertaining the meaning of any other writing.

  7. Western Greyhound v. Superior Court

    165 Cal.App.2d 216 (Cal. Ct. App. 1958)   Cited 8 times

    Docket No. 23341. November 17, 1958. PROCEEDING in mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Los Angeles County to dismiss an action and to command the clerk thereof not to transmit the action to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Writ granted. Gilbert, Thompson Kelly and W.I. Gilbert, Jr., for Petitioner. Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, and William E. Lamoreaux, Assistant County Counsel, for Respondents. Raymond R. Roberts and Corman Hansen for Real Party in Interest.