§Why CasetextPricing

Sorensen v. CTT Tools, Inc. et al

RESPONSE in Opposition re MOTION for Exception to Stay to Preserve Evidence

1 Cited authority

  1. In re Napster, Inc. Copyright Litigation

    462 F. Supp. 2d 1060 (N.D. Cal. 2006)   Cited 281 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that even if the defendant was only "grossly negligent in executing its duties to preserve evidence [] by failing to implement a litigation hold," this satisfied the state of mind requirement for a finding of spoliation