550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 276,716 times 369 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend when the claimant had failed to explain how an amendment would cure the deficiencies identified by the district court
Holding that because a "Board lacks the power to control the hiring, termination, or supervision of a Sheriff's employees, or otherwise control the terms and conditions of their employment, there can be no basis upon which a jury could determine that the Board owes a [duty to provide accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act]."
Finding that the Bonnette factors provided the best framework for determining whether an agency that provided temporary workers to other entities was a joint employer of the workers under the FLSA
Holding father and son owners of restaurants, with generally alleged powers to "discipline, control work schedules, and set rate and method of pay" for plaintiffs, were plausibly employers under FLSA and MWHL
Affirming the district court's rejection of the plaintiff's request for leave to amend where the amendment would have been futile because the claims were untimely