8 Cited authorities

  1. Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.

    290 F.3d 1043 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 1,095 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding state law governing underlying claims in a diversity action “also governs the award of fees”
  2. Rawlings v. Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc.

    9 F.3d 513 (6th Cir. 1993)   Cited 254 times
    Holding that use of either the lodestar or percentage method of calculating attorney's fees is appropriate in common fund cases
  3. Rodriguez v. Disner

    688 F.3d 645 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 130 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that objectors conferred a benefit on the class warranting an award of attorney's fees where their objections were instrumental in causing the district court to deny fees to class counsel
  4. In re Ikon Office Solutions, Inc., Securities Litigation

    194 F.R.D. 166 (E.D. Pa. 2000)   Cited 182 times
    Finding that $100 million is the informal marker constituting a "very large" settlement
  5. Lonardo v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

    706 F. Supp. 2d 766 (N.D. Ohio 2010)   Cited 103 times
    Approving incentive awards of $5,000 to plaintiffs who substantially contributed to litigation and testified at the fairness hearing
  6. Parker v. Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P.

    631 F. Supp. 2d 242 (E.D.N.Y. 2009)   Cited 31 times
    Concluding that no lodestar multiplier was necessary because "any thought of increasing Class Counsel's award for bringing a suit that risked non-payment is overcome by the need to avoid a windfall award that exceeds the value of the benefits to Class Members and unduly incentivizes the prosecution of such claims in the future"
  7. In re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation

    273 F. Supp. 2d 563 (D.N.J. 2003)   Cited 15 times
    Analyzing objectors' contribution using the Gunter factors
  8. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system