11 Cited authorities

Staton v. Boeing Co.
327 F.3d 938 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 1,927 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that "named plaintiffs ... are eligible for reasonable incentive payments" in addition to reimbursement "for their substantiated litigation expenses, and identifiable services rendered to the class directly under the supervision of class counsel"
Molski v. Gleich
318 F.3d 937 (9th Cir. 2003) Cited 322 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that decisions based on per se rules are not appropriate because they nullify the discretion vested in the district court through Rule 23
Picus v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
256 F.R.D. 651 (D. Nev. 2009) Cited 79 times
Holding that a private Nevada DTPA claim requires "damage to the plaintiff"
Topaz Mutual Co. v. Marsh
108 Nev. 845 (Nev. 1992) Cited 107 times
Finding that an unjust enrichment cannot lie where there is an express written agreement
Perrone v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
232 F.3d 433 (5th Cir. 2000) Cited 76 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that detrimental reliance is an element of a claim for actual damages and rejecting numerous arguments to the contrary
Unionamerica Mtg. v. McDonald
97 Nev. 210 (Nev. 1981) Cited 130 times
Stating that "unjust enrichment" is modern counterpart of quasi-contract
Windham at Carmel Mountain Ranch Assn. v. Superior Court
109 Cal.App.4th 1162 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003) Cited 67 times
Noting that exceptions to privity apply to certain products
Haromy v. Sawyer
98 Nev. 544 (Nev. 1982) Cited 29 times
Holding that a liquidated damages provision was a penalty when respondent produced evidence of post-agreement payments, capital improvement expenditures, and increased rental income and appellants failed to prove that they sustained actual damages caused by respondent's breach
Arnesano v. State, Dep't Transp
113 Nev. 815 (Nev. 1997) Cited 12 times
Affirming the district court's award of damages of $50,000 each for decedent's wife and two children
Martinez v. State
120 Nev. 200 (Nev. 2004) Cited 4 times
Stating that criminal fines are pecuniary forms of punishment
Section 1715 - Notifications to appropriate Federal and State officials
28 U.S.C. § 1715 Cited 1,228 times 21 Legal Analyses
Providing list of information required to be included with the CAFA notice

Sobel et al v. Hertz Corporation

11 Cited authorities

Holding that "named plaintiffs ... are eligible for reasonable incentive payments" in addition to reimbursement "for their substantiated litigation expenses, and identifiable services rendered to the class directly under the supervision of class counsel"

Holding that decisions based on per se rules are not appropriate because they nullify the discretion vested in the district court through Rule 23

Holding that a private Nevada DTPA claim requires "damage to the plaintiff"

Finding that an unjust enrichment cannot lie where there is an express written agreement

Holding that detrimental reliance is an element of a claim for actual damages and rejecting numerous arguments to the contrary

Stating that "unjust enrichment" is modern counterpart of quasi-contract

Noting that exceptions to privity apply to certain products

Holding that a liquidated damages provision was a penalty when respondent produced evidence of post-agreement payments, capital improvement expenditures, and increased rental income and appellants failed to prove that they sustained actual damages caused by respondent's breach

Affirming the district court's award of damages of $50,000 each for decedent's wife and two children

Stating that criminal fines are pecuniary forms of punishment

Providing list of information required to be included with the CAFA notice