20 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,991 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 216,978 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  3. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

    475 U.S. 574 (1986)   Cited 113,466 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation

    497 U.S. 871 (1990)   Cited 9,571 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to admit affidavits in support of standing when filed after summary judgment briefing and hearing were complete
  5. Villiarimo v. Aloha Island Air, Inc.

    281 F.3d 1054 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 2,812 times
    Holding that summary judgment was appropriate even where the decision-maker's reason is "foolish or trivial or even baseless"
  6. Anheuser-Busch v. Natural Beverage Distributors

    69 F.3d 337 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 748 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that terminating sanctions are available when "a party has engaged deliberately in deceptive practices that undermine the integrity of judicial proceedings"
  7. Clarke v. American Commerce Nat. Bank

    974 F.2d 127 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 256 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that billing correspondence is not protected unless it `also reveal the motive of the client in seeking representation, litigation strategy, or the specific nature of the services provided, such as researching particular areas of law'
  8. Stalk v. Mushkin, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 3, 48201 (2009)

    199 P.3d 838 (Nev. 2009)   Cited 105 times
    Holding that business-interference-type claims are a species of property torts for the purpose of the statute of limitations
  9. Kuhn v. Account Control Technology, Inc.

    865 F. Supp. 1443 (D. Nev. 1994)   Cited 119 times
    Holding that "acting as a collection agency without being licensed by the proper state authority" violated §§ 1692e, 1692e, and 1692f
  10. Mainor v. Nault

    120 Nev. 750 (Nev. 2004)   Cited 59 times
    Holding that "a violation of a rule of professional conduct alone [cannot] serve as a basis for civil liability"
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 329,861 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 95,836 times   658 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  13. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,233 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
  14. Rule 34 - Producing Documents, Electronically Stored Information, and Tangible Things, or Entering onto Land, for Inspection and Other Purposes

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 34   Cited 13,225 times   149 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the rules related to electronic discovery were "not meant to create a routine right of direct access to a party's electronic information system, although such access may be justified in some circumstances."
  15. Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 33   Cited 10,962 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Rule 30(b)