9 Cited authorities

Magness v. Russian Federation
247 F.3d 609 (5th Cir. 2001) Cited 66 times
Holding that by sending process to Boris Yeltsin, then-President of the Russian Federation, through the Texas Secretary of State, rather than requesting service by the clerk of court, plaintiffs did not strictly comply with § 1608
Fujitsu Ltd. v. Belkin Int'l Inc.
782 F. Supp. 2d 868 (N.D. Cal. 2011) Cited 38 times
Finding personal jurisdiction in a patent infringement case where defendant made direct sales into the forum five years prior to filing suit
Modern Computer Corp. v. Ma
862 F. Supp. 938 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) Cited 33 times
Allowing service via mail under Rule 4(f) where the plaintiff submitted an affidavit claiming that service via mail complied with the law of the recipient country
SignalQuest, Inc. v. Chou
284 F.R.D. 45 (D.N.H. 2012) Cited 7 times 1 Legal Analyses
Robert R. Lucic, Sheehan Phinney Bass & Green, Manchester, NH, for SignalQuest, Inc. Thomas J. Donovan, Nicholas F. Casolaro, McLane Graf Raulerson & Middleton, Manchester, NH, Timothy N. Trop, Trop, Pruner & Hu, P.C., Houston, TX, for Tien-Ming Chou and Oncque Corporation. MEMORANDUM ORDER JOSEPH N. LaPLANTE, District Judge. When service of process absolutely, positively has to be effected on a Taiwanese defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(f)(2)(C)(ii), is Federal Express enough
In re Schwinn Bicycle Co.
190 B.R. 599 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1995) Cited 9 times
Bankruptcy Nos. 92 B 22474 to 92 B 22484. Adv. No. 94 A 01618. December 13, 1995. Howard Feller, Dion W. Hayes, McGuire Woods Battle Boothe, Richmond, VA, and Mark K. Thomas, Terry R. Horwitz Kass, Katten Muchin Zavis, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff Schwinn Plan Committee. Liang Houh Sheih, Taipei Taiwan, ROC, and Eric G. Grossman, Bailey Borlack Nadelhoffer Carroll, Chicago, IL, for Defendants Fairly Bike and Ming-Tay. MEMORANDUM OPINION INCLUDING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON FAIRLY BIKE
Rule 4 - Summons
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 Cited 71,368 times 127 Legal Analyses
Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
Rule 28 - Persons Before Whom Depositions May Be Taken
Fed. R. Civ. P. 28 Cited 18,566 times 7 Legal Analyses
Requiring appellant's argument to contain citations to authorities
Section 9 - Award of arbitrators; confirmation; jurisdiction; procedure
9 U.S.C. § 9 Cited 3,604 times 23 Legal Analyses
Providing that a court considering a motion to confirm "must grant" confirmation "unless the award is vacated ... as prescribed in"
Section 1781 - Transmittal of letter rogatory or request
28 U.S.C. § 1781 Cited 309 times 3 Legal Analyses
Authorizing "the transmittal of a letter rogatory or request directly from a tribunal in the United States to foreign or international tribunal, officer, or agency"

Smyser Kaplan & Veselka LLP v. Su et al

9 Cited authorities

Holding that by sending process to Boris Yeltsin, then-President of the Russian Federation, through the Texas Secretary of State, rather than requesting service by the clerk of court, plaintiffs did not strictly comply with § 1608

Finding personal jurisdiction in a patent infringement case where defendant made direct sales into the forum five years prior to filing suit

Allowing service via mail under Rule 4(f) where the plaintiff submitted an affidavit claiming that service via mail complied with the law of the recipient country

Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

Requiring appellant's argument to contain citations to authorities

Providing that a court considering a motion to confirm "must grant" confirmation "unless the award is vacated ... as prescribed in"

Authorizing "the transmittal of a letter rogatory or request directly from a tribunal in the United States to foreign or international tribunal, officer, or agency"