§Why CasetextPricing

SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline v. Abbott Laboratories

MOTION Entry of Judgment Under Rule 58

8 Cited authorities

  1. Marshall v. Miller

    302 N.C. 539 (N.C. 1981)   Cited 419 times
    Holding that trebling is automatic

  2. Marfia v. T.C. Ziraat Bankasi, New York Branch

    147 F.3d 83 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 160 times
    Holding that "federal law does not apply to the calculation of prejudgment interest on supplemental state law claims"

  3. Filmline Prod. v. United Artists

    662 F. Supp. 798 (S.D.N.Y. 1987)   Cited 10 times
    Requiring plaintiff to prove offsetting costs saved by reason of defendant's wrongful conduct

  4. Morse v. Swank, Inc.

    520 F. Supp. 829 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)   Cited 9 times

    No. 77 Civ. 5185 (CHT). August 14, 1981. Solin Breindel, New York City, for plaintiff; Howard Breindel, Robert Aronson, New York City, of counsel. Greenbaum, Wolff Ernst, New York City, for defendants Pierre Cardin and S.A.R.L. de Gestion Pierre Cardin; Sydney J. Schwartz, Lisa S. Rothblum, New York City, of counsel. OPINION TENNEY, District Judge. After a jury trial, the plaintiff Marvin W. Morse was awarded a verdict of $435,000 against the defendant S.A.R.L. de Gestion Pierre Cardin. The parties

  5. Rule 54 - Judgment; Costs

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 54   Cited 43,010 times   146 Legal Analyses
    Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"

  6. Rule 58 - Entering Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 58   Cited 19,566 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that, after a jury verdict, the Court must enter judgment "in a separate document"

  7. Section 5001 - Interest to verdict, report or decision

    N.Y. CPLR 5001   Cited 2,500 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Allowing prejudgment interest in contract cases

  8. Section 75-16 - Civil action by person injured; treble damages

    N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-16   Cited 336 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Providing for a private cause of action