29 Cited authorities

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009) Cited 263,477 times 281 Legal Analyses
Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 276,716 times 369 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
Red Hawk v. Schneider
493 F.3d 1174 (10th Cir. 2007) Cited 2,789 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that an allegation that the arbitration panel improperly overruled objections as to venue "because the fact that an arbitration award was held in an improper venue does not call into question the merits of the award."
Dolan v. Postal Service
546 U.S. 481 (2006) Cited 663 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that "negligent transmission" of postal matter "does not comprehend all negligence occurring in the course of mail delivery"
Dias v. City & County of Denver
567 F.3d 1169 (10th Cir. 2009) Cited 676 times
Holding plaintiffs lacked standing where they did not allege a credible threat of future prosecution
Shapiro v. United States
335 U.S. 1 (1948) Cited 450 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that "essentially regulatory" recordkeeping may be required of private individuals without violating the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
Hecla v. New Hampshire
811 P.2d 1083 (Colo. 1991) Cited 303 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that, to avoid policy coverage, the insurer must be able to show that the exclusions are not subject to any other reasonable interpretation
Bly v. Story
241 P.3d 529 (Colo. 2010) Cited 92 times
Noting that trial court's condemnation decree specified private way of necessity “shall be used for building, construction, residence in, and maintenance of one single-family home,” thus allaying condemnee's concern that condemnor would commercially develop her property
Deherrera v. Decker Truck Line, Inc.
820 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2016) Cited 50 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that although exempt under a separate provision, truck drivers are part of one of the industries subject to the CMWO
Salazar v. Butterball, LLC
644 F.3d 1130 (10th Cir. 2011) Cited 48 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a circuit split over whether donning and doffing personal protective equipment is considered "changing clothes" under 29 U.S.C. § 203(o) shows that the term "changing clothes" is ambiguous
Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading
Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 Cited 162,084 times 197 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
Section 201 - Short title
29 U.S.C. § 201 Cited 21,367 times 104 Legal Analyses
Setting fourteen as the minimum age for most non-agricultural work
Section 206 - Minimum wage
29 U.S.C. § 206 Cited 9,034 times 101 Legal Analyses
Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”
Section 203 - Definitions
29 U.S.C. § 203 Cited 6,971 times 280 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that "custom or practice" under a collective-bargaining agreement can make changing clothes noncompensable
Section 8-4-101 - Definitions
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-4-101 Cited 130 times 20 Legal Analyses
Defining "wages" as "all amounts for labor performed by employees" and providing that, once determinable, "such amount shall be payable to the employee"
Section 8-4-105 - Payroll deductions permitted - notice required
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-4-105 Cited 1 times 2 Legal Analyses
(1) An employer shall not make a deduction from the wages or compensation of an employee except as follows: (a) Deductions mandated by or in accordance with local, state, or federal law including, but not limited to, deductions for taxes, "Federal Insurance Contributions Act" ("FICA") requirements, garnishments, or any other court-ordered deduction; (a.5) Deductions for contributions attributable to automatic enrollment in an employee retirement plan, as defined in section 8-4-105.5, regardless of

Smith v. Mini Mart Inc. et al

29 Cited authorities

Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint

Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing

Holding that an allegation that the arbitration panel improperly overruled objections as to venue "because the fact that an arbitration award was held in an improper venue does not call into question the merits of the award."

Holding that "negligent transmission" of postal matter "does not comprehend all negligence occurring in the course of mail delivery"

Holding plaintiffs lacked standing where they did not allege a credible threat of future prosecution

Holding that "essentially regulatory" recordkeeping may be required of private individuals without violating the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination

Holding that, to avoid policy coverage, the insurer must be able to show that the exclusions are not subject to any other reasonable interpretation

Noting that trial court's condemnation decree specified private way of necessity “shall be used for building, construction, residence in, and maintenance of one single-family home,” thus allaying condemnee's concern that condemnor would commercially develop her property

Holding that although exempt under a separate provision, truck drivers are part of one of the industries subject to the CMWO

Holding that a circuit split over whether donning and doffing personal protective equipment is considered "changing clothes" under 29 U.S.C. § 203(o) shows that the term "changing clothes" is ambiguous

Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."

Setting fourteen as the minimum age for most non-agricultural work

Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”

Recognizing that "custom or practice" under a collective-bargaining agreement can make changing clothes noncompensable

Defining "wages" as "all amounts for labor performed by employees" and providing that, once determinable, "such amount shall be payable to the employee"