30 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 271,409 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts are not required "to credit a complaint's conclusory statements without reference to its factual context"
  2. Dolan v. Postal Service

    546 U.S. 481 (2006)   Cited 687 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "negligent transmission" of postal matter "does not comprehend all negligence occurring in the course of mail delivery"
  3. Shapiro v. United States

    335 U.S. 1 (1948)   Cited 450 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "essentially regulatory" recordkeeping may be required of private individuals without violating the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
  4. Hecla v. New Hampshire

    811 P.2d 1083 (Colo. 1991)   Cited 305 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to avoid policy coverage, the insurer must be able to show that the exclusions are not subject to any other reasonable interpretation
  5. Bly v. Story

    241 P.3d 529 (Colo. 2010)   Cited 93 times
    Noting that trial court's condemnation decree specified private way of necessity “shall be used for building, construction, residence in, and maintenance of one single-family home,” thus allaying condemnee's concern that condemnor would commercially develop her property
  6. DCB Construction Co. v. Central City Development Co.

    965 P.2d 115 (Colo. 1998)   Cited 103 times
    Holding that unjust enrichment requires a showing of improper, deceitful, or misleading conduct
  7. Melat, Pressman & Higbie, L.L.P. v. Hannon Law Firm, L.L.C.

    287 P.3d 842 (Colo. 2012)   Cited 66 times
    Holding that an attorney may recover the reasonable value of services provided to former co-counsel under a theory of quantum meruit
  8. Deherrera v. Decker Truck Line, Inc.

    820 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2016)   Cited 52 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that although exempt under a separate provision, truck drivers are part of one of the industries subject to the CMWO
  9. Salazar v. Butterball, LLC

    644 F.3d 1130 (10th Cir. 2011)   Cited 48 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a circuit split over whether donning and doffing personal protective equipment is considered "changing clothes" under 29 U.S.C. § 203(o) shows that the term "changing clothes" is ambiguous
  10. Pabst v. Okla. Gas & Elec. Co.

    228 F.3d 1128 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 59 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding decision of trial court that employer acted with reasonable grounds, in part, because the law at issue was "fact-sensitive"
  11. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 166,425 times   198 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  12. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 36,582 times   1266 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
  13. Section 201 - Short title

    29 U.S.C. § 201   Cited 21,681 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Setting fourteen as the minimum age for most non-agricultural work
  14. Section 206 - Minimum wage

    29 U.S.C. § 206   Cited 9,174 times   103 Legal Analyses
    Asking only whether the alleged inequality resulted from “any other factor other than sex”
  15. Section 203 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 203   Cited 7,096 times   282 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "custom or practice" under a collective-bargaining agreement can make changing clothes noncompensable
  16. Section 8-4-101 - Definitions

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-4-101   Cited 139 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Defining "wages" as "all amounts for labor performed by employees" and providing that, once determinable, "such amount shall be payable to the employee"
  17. Section 8-4-105 - Payroll deductions permitted - notice required

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-4-105   Cited 2 times   3 Legal Analyses

    (1) An employer shall not make a deduction from the wages or compensation of an employee except as follows: (a) Deductions mandated by or in accordance with local, state, or federal law including, but not limited to, deductions for taxes, "Federal Insurance Contributions Act" ("FICA") requirements, garnishments, or any other court-ordered deduction; (a.5) Deductions for contributions attributable to automatic enrollment in an employee retirement plan, as defined in section 8-4-105.5, regardless of