23 Cited authorities

  1. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.

    505 U.S. 763 (1992)   Cited 1,957 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to establish a claim for trade dress infringement, secondary meaning, non-functionality and likelihood of confusion must all be shown
  2. Black v. Lane

    22 F.3d 1395 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 763 times
    Holding that when default judgment is entered, factual allegations are treated as true and a defaulted defendant may no longer challenge them—"[a]s a general rule, a default judgment establishes, as a matter of law, that defendants are liable to plaintiff as to each cause of action alleged in the complaint"
  3. O'Brien v. R.J. O'Brien Associates, Inc.

    998 F.2d 1394 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 469 times
    Holding that defendant waived insufficiency of process objection by failing to raise it in motion to vacate default
  4. Wehrs v. Wells

    688 F.3d 886 (7th Cir. 2012)   Cited 211 times
    Holding that causation is necessary to obtain damages under Rule 55(b)
  5. Fitzgerald Pub. Co., Inc. v. Baylor Pub. Co.

    807 F.2d 1110 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 437 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding a printer and a publisher liable for infringement of a literary work
  6. CAE, Inc. v. Clean Air Engineering, Inc.

    267 F.3d 660 (7th Cir. 2001)   Cited 280 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the individuals plaintiff advanced as actually confused were not relevant "consumers" under the Lanham Act because plaintiff did not show that they purchased or attempted to purchase the goods in question
  7. Autozone, Inc. v. Strick

    543 F.3d 923 (7th Cir. 2008)   Cited 132 times
    Holding that the evidence that the plaintiff had spent millions of dollars' on advertising to promote its mark and that the mark was displayed prominently on thousands of stores nationally was more than sufficient to establish the mark's strength
  8. Barbecue Marx, Inc. v. 551 Ogden, Inc.

    235 F.3d 1041 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that although the marks "SMOKE DADDY" and "BONE DADDY" are similar in appearance and suggestion, their distinct visual presentations significantly undercut the strength of the plaintiff's argument that the marks are likely to be confused
  9. Specht v. Google, Inc.

    660 F. Supp. 2d 858 (N.D. Ill. 2009)   Cited 42 times
    Holding allegations sufficient to survive motion to dismiss where plaintiffs alleged the mark infringed, the time frame, a similar mark used by defendants, and the type of infringing activities
  10. International Korwin Corp. v. Kowalczyk

    855 F.2d 375 (7th Cir. 1988)   Cited 78 times
    Finding that a nightclub owner acted willfully by continuing to play plaintiffs' copyrighted songs and by passing plaintiffs' infringement notices off as "a nuisance"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 347,142 times   923 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 54 - Judgment; Costs

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 54   Cited 41,324 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"
  13. Rule 55 - Default; Default Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 55   Cited 33,015 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Adopting similar language for acquiring default judgment against the United States
  14. Section 1125 - False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden

    15 U.S.C. § 1125   Cited 15,311 times   321 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the person who asserts trade dress protection has the burden of proving that the matter sought to be protected is not functional"
  15. Section 1114 - Remedies; infringement; innocent infringement by printers and publishers

    15 U.S.C. § 1114   Cited 7,924 times   89 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable "Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant — use in commerce any reproduction . . . of a registered mark . . . in connection with which such use is likely to cause confusion."
  16. Section 1117 - Recovery for violation of rights

    15 U.S.C. § 1117   Cited 4,899 times   144 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts significant discretion to award damages for a violation of § 1125
  17. Section 1116 - Injunctive relief

    15 U.S.C. § 1116   Cited 2,722 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts the "power to grant injunctions, according to principles of equity . . ., to prevent the violation of any right" of the trademark owner
  18. Section 1118 - Destruction of infringing articles

    15 U.S.C. § 1118   Cited 448 times   1 Legal Analyses

    In any action arising under this chapter, in which a violation of any right of the registrant of a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office, a violation under section 1125(a) of this title, or a willful violation under section 1125(c) of this title, shall have been established, the court may order that all labels, signs, prints, packages, wrappers, receptacles, and advertisements in the possession of the defendant, bearing the registered mark or, in the case of a violation of section 1125(a)