§Why CasetextPricing

Simran Services Llc et al v. Everest Foods Inc. et al

BRIEF in Opposition

15 Cited authorities

  1. ATT CO. v. WINBACK AND CONSERVE PROGRAM, INC

    42 F.3d 1421 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 914 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party must produce sufficient evidence of all four factors prior to granting injunctive relief

  2. Opticians Ass'n v. Independent Opticians

    920 F.2d 187 (3d Cir. 1990)   Cited 772 times
    Holding that "there is a great likelihood of confusion when an infringer uses the exact trademark"

  3. Abrams v. Donati

    66 N.Y.2d 951 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 377 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding individual standing not available where, inter alia, "there is no claim that plaintiff sustained a loss disproportionate to that sustained by" the corporation

  4. Allegheny Energy, Inc. v. DQE, Inc.

    171 F.3d 153 (3d Cir. 1999)   Cited 188 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing preliminary injunction factors

  5. Crowe v. De Gioia

    90 N.J. 126 (N.J. 1982)   Cited 299 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that alimony-authorization statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, does not embrace action on contract between unmarried cohabitants

  6. Tanimura Antle v. Packed Fresh Produce

    222 F.3d 132 (3d Cir. 2000)   Cited 131 times
    Holding that because sellers who qualified as PACA trust beneficiaries "demonstrated the likelihood of dissipation of trust fund assets and the likelihood of irreparable harm, the District Court should have granted the injunction sought."

  7. Strasenburgh v. Straubmuller

    146 N.J. 527 (N.J. 1996)   Cited 84 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding diminution in value, waste, and breach of fiduciary to be classically derivative

  8. Pacific Intern. Marketing v. a B Produce

    462 F.3d 279 (3d Cir. 2006)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that in passing PACA, "Congress intended to protect sellers and suppliers of produce, not third-party service providers whose services are ancillary to the sale of produce"

  9. Circus Fruits Wholesale Corp. v. Farmer Joen Produce Corp.

    Civil Action No. 17-1812 (D.N.J. Apr. 18, 2017)   Cited 4 times

    Civil Action No. 17-1812 04-18-2017 CIRCUS FRUITS WHOLESALE CORP., Plaintiff, v. FARMER JOEN PRODUCE CORP. and JU GIL JOEN, Defendants. John Michael Vazquez, U.S.D.J. Not for Publication OPINION John Michael Vazquez , U.S.D.J. This matter comes before the Court by way of the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Circus Fruits Wholesale Corporation ("Circus Fruits"). D.E. 3. The Court reviewed Circus Fruits' submissions (D.E. 1, 3, 4) and heard oral argument

  10. S. Katzman Produce, Inc. v. Depiero's Farm, Inc.

    Civil Action No.: 12-1384 (ES) (D.N.J. Mar. 8, 2012)   Cited 7 times
    Granting TRO without notice to Defendants

  11. Rule 65 - Injunctions and Restraining Orders

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 65   Cited 23,302 times   90 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing court's ability to enter emergency order with less than full adversary hearing and even, in appropriate circumstances, without notice

  12. Section 1746 - Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

    28 U.S.C. § 1746   Cited 10,349 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Making affidavits and declarations effectively synonymous

  13. Section 626 - Shareholders' derivative action brought in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor

    N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law § 626   Cited 502 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that a plaintiff must be “a holder at the time of bringing the action and that he was such a holder at the time of the transaction of which he complains”

  14. Section 42:2C-1 - Short title

    N.J. Stat. § 42:2C-1   Cited 50 times   1 Legal Analyses

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act." N.J.S. § 42:2C-1 Added by L. 2012, c. 50,s. 1, eff. 3/18/2013.